incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
Subject Re: Flex Charts: Will they improve?
Date Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:28:48 GMT
Another thing I think could be interesting should be to get something like
LESS or SASS in flex

http://lesscss.org/

http://sass-lang.com/



2012/1/17 Avinash Narayanan <avinashapr9@gmail.com>

> Hi all,
>
> I have another request. albeit a more difficult one to implement. Dynamic
> CSS where we dont have to compile the CSS into swfs before having to use
> them.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > this will be a great improvement since it will be a step forward in get
> CSS
> > in Flex compete with CSS in other technologies (aka HTML5).
> >
> > layout, itemrenders and all visualconfigurations should be able to be
> > delegated to a CSS. With Flex 4 advanced CSS selectors we had a great
> > evolution, now I think we should work to continue that evolution.
> >
> > Great idea so far :)
> >
> > C.
> >
> >
> > 2012/1/17 Jose Barragan <jose.barragan@codeoscopic.com>
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Dwayne Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > * 4.
> > > > #horizontal-axis-renderer.axis-lines,
> > > > #horizontal-axis-renderer.tick-placements,
> > > > #vertical-axis-renderer.axis-lines,
> > > > #vertical-axis-renderer.tick-placements { display: none; }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dwayne Henderson <
> > > > its.code.in.here@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks a lot everyone for listening!
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm just a poor CSS developer, I'm afraid I can't really contribute
> > yet.
> > > >> All I can do is beg for full CSS support:
> > > >>
> > > >> (some of this logic may be a bit off, but I hope y'all understand
> > > >> nonetheless)
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Positioning items in a row:
> > > >>
> > > >> <s:layout>
> > > >>  <s:HorizontalLayout />
> > > >> </s:layout>
> > > >>
> > > >> Oughta be: #column-chart { display: inline; }
> > > >>
> > > >> 2. Hiding shadows:
> > > >>
> > > >> <mx:seriesFilters>
> > > >>  <fx:Array />
> > > >> </mx:seriesFilters>
> > > >>
> > > >> Oughta be: #column-chart { box-shadow: none; }
> > > >>
> > > >> Or: .drop-shadow { display: none; }
> > > >>
> > > >> 3. Hiding grid lines:
> > > >>
> > > >> <mx:backgroundElements>
> > > >>  <fx:Array />
> > > >> </mx:backgroundElements>
> > > >>
> > > >> Oughta be: .grid-lines { display: none; }
> > > >>
> > > >> 4. Hiding axis lines and tick placements:
> > > >>
> > > >> <mx:horizontalAxisRenderers>
> > > >>  <mx:AxisRenderer id="horizontalAxis" axis="{chart.horizontalAxis}"
> > > >> showLine="false" tickPlacement="none" />
> > > >> </mx:horizontalAxisRenderers>
> > > >> <mx:verticalAxisRenderers>
> > > >>  <mx:AxisRenderer id="verticalAxis" axis="{chart.verticalAxis}"
> > > >> showLine="false" tickPlacement="none" />
> > > >> </mx:verticalAxisRenderers>
> > > >>
> > > >> Oughta be:
> > > >>
> > > >> #horizontal-axis-renderer.gridlines,
> > > >> #horizontal-axis-renderer.tick-placements,
> > > >> #vertical-axis-renderer.gridlines,
> > > >> #vertical-axis-renderer.tick-placements { display: none; }
> > > >>
> > > >> 8. No made up declaration names (make those selectors instead):
> > > >>
> > > >> .myAxisStyles { showLine: false; tickPlacement: none; }
> > > >>
> > > >> Oughta be: .axis-lines, .tick-placements { display: none; }
> > > >>
> > > >> 5. Use real size units:
> > > >>
> > > >> mx|DataTip { paddingLeft: 3; paddingTop: 3; }
> > > >>
> > > >> Oughta be: .datatip { padding-left: 3px; padding-top: 3px; }
> > > >>
> > > >> 7. Support CSS shorthand:
> > > >>
> > > >> .datatip { padding: 3px 0 0 3px; }
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks again!
> > > >>
> > > >> --Dwayne
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:35 AM, David Arno <david@davidarno.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>> From: Dwayne Henderson [mailto:its.code.in.here@gmail.com]
> > > >>>> Sent: 17 January 2012 00:17
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Does anybody know if this will change?
> > > >>>> Are there any new Flex charting libraries in the making?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +1 to what Roland said. If you feel up to it, get writing them
> > yourself
> > > >>> and
> > > >>> submit them. It's the best way of ensuring that a new Flex charting
> > > >>> library
> > > >>> gets written. Even if you don't think your skills are up to it,
you
> > can
> > > >>> still help by documenting what you think is wrong with the current
> > ones
> > > >>> and
> > > >>> how they could be improved. This may well spur someone else to
get
> > > >>> involved.
> > > >>> Adobe Flex work isn't just confined to committers (I'm not one
> after
> > > all):
> > > >>> everyone in the Flex community is encouraged to take part. :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> David.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Director de Tecnología
> > M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > F:  +34 912 35 57 77
> >
> > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> > Avd. del General Perón, 32
> > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
> > 28020 Madrid
> >
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 35 57 77

CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
Avd. del General Perón, 32
Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
28020 Madrid

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message