incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joan Llenas Masó <joan.llenas.m...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide to building the SDK (and a question))
Date Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:17:23 GMT
>From a developer standpoint is less problematic to use years.
>From a product standpoint has less impact because users always know what to
expect.


--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)



On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 16:11, Michael Schmalle <mike@teotigraphix.com>wrote:

> Does anyone have any idea why Alex suggested years? Was there a reason?
>
> I am in agreement as well with what Omar stated, just curious why Alex
> would deviate from what most developers were expecting.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Quoting Yennick Trevels <yennick.trevels@gmail.com>:
>
>  Simple, logical and easy to understand for "the outside world". Perfect
>> imo.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Campos <jonbcampos@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  It is also what I thought from the beginning.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > This version number scheme has been in my mind the entire time.  It
>>> makes
>>> > complete sense.
>>> >
>>> > -Nick
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jeffry Houser <jeffry@dot-com-it.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On 1/22/2012 9:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme?
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >  This approach seems logical enough to me and I have nothing else to
>>> add.
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Jeffry Houser
>>> > > Technical Entrepreneur
>>> > > 203-379-0773
>>> > > --
>>> > > http://www.flextras.com?c=104
>>> > > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
>>> > > --
>>> > > http://www.theflexshow.com
>>> > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com
>>> > > http://www.asktheflexpert.com
>>> > > --
>>> > > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Campos
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message