incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Poole <mattjpo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] PPMC members to decide voting procedure
Date Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:03:41 GMT
I saw your post and figured you'd got my meaning.

Thanks
Matt

On 14 January 2012 23:01, Michael Schmalle <mike@teotigraphix.com> wrote:

>
> BTW,
>
> Doug brought this up today and you might have read the post. I wrote a
> thread called [LOGO INFO] replying to the group. I didn't quite address
> your real issue (multiple submissions). This is possible with numbering the
> same name in the title of separate threads.
>
> When I originally read this I thought you were speaking about the actual
> variations on the design itself.
>
> Hope this clears up things for authors/designers that do feel they have
> multiple logo designs.
>
>
> Mike
>
> Quoting Matthew Poole <mattjpoole@gmail.com>:
>
>  Cool.
>>
>> On 14 Jan 2012 13:08, "Michael Schmalle" <mike@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> """
>>> Note: The design as accepted by popular vote will be treated as a
>>> proposal
>>> that can be tweaked and cemented into it's final published form.
>>> """
>>>
>>> Note the rules say "design" not logo. What you are worried about is not
>>> an
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> AIt has also been stated that the url that was submitted is the design
>>> being voted on even if designers make newer versions, they need to update
>>> the original submission url.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Matthew Poole <mattjpoole@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>  Incidentally, many of the logos on the submissions page have multiple
>>>
>>>> variations. How would the voters know the are voting for the
>>>> same variation of a specific logo?
>>>>
>>>> Might not be important, but perhaps we should have stipulated that the
>>>> entrants provide one variation only per submission, but allow multiple
>>>> submissions per entrant?
>>>>
>>>> On 13 January 2012 20:26, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Alex,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> IMHO, the PPMC is that set of managers and should make the final
>>>>> > decision.
>>>>> >> It sounds like we have some folks who understand branding issues
>>>>> > commenting
>>>>> >> on the submissions.  I think that's enough information for the
PPMC
>>>>> to
>>>>> > go
>>>>> >> with.  A popular vote in these circumstances is not controlled
>>>>> enough.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Agree in full. Apart from the comments I have been making to some
of
>>>>> the
>>>>> > logo submission there have been others with a good grasp of some
of
>>>>> the
>>>>> > issues regarding branding doing the same. On the other hand I worry
a
>>>>> lot
>>>>> > that, on an open, uncontrolled poll, popularity issues become
>>>>> prevalent
>>>>> and
>>>>> > that's definitely not the way I'd like a logo for Flex to be chosen.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is why the vote needs to be on the list. All of us can see who
>>>>> cast
>>>>> each vote. A lot of work for the person tallying the results, but it
is
>>>>> completely transparent. This is particularly important for PPMC votes
>>>>> which
>>>>> are the ones that are "binding."
>>>>>
>>>>> The PPMC ought to consider what the larger community thinks. Remember
>>>>> one
>>>>> of the goals for graduation from the incubator is proving the
>>>>> capability
>>>>> of
>>>>> growing and adding new committers to the project based on the merits
of
>>>>> their contributions to the community. The community includes more than
>>>>> coding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Rui
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message