incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Csomák Gábor <csom...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jira task to decide on Apache Flex version number needed
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:49:38 GMT
version numbering is a hot topic nowadays. Think of the chrome and linux
numberings.. they got a lot faster last year.  I personally don't like
that, but thats the trend for marketing reasons.
I think the years are a good middle-of-the road solution. Flex 2012.1.x in
my opinion is better.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:

> Bertrand,
>
>
> Another related task is figuring out the next version number.  Apache Flex
> ???.
>
> Adobe is shipping Adobe Flex 4.6.0 and we can't rule out the possibility
> that there might be an Adobe Flex 4.6.x.
>
> Alex suggested using years which I like.  I'm not sure if that means
> Apache Flex 2012.1.x or Apache Flex 2012 1.0.x, or some variant.
>
> Carol
>
> On 1/18/12 8 :57AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as>
> >wrote:
> >> I forgot you can't downvote within JIRA...  I'll do it here...
> >>
> >> -1
> >
> >Note that FLEX-7 doesn't say that a package rename must happen now,
> >nor that it should be discussed now - it's just something that must be
> >clarified before graduation. There's no hurry to discuss it.
> >
> >-Bertrand
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message