incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Martin <windo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:08:38 GMT
Nvm, on my request.  Forgive mi ignorance :)  I researched a little
bit about the PPMC :)  I'm new to this list, and i don't know where
this thread would surface.  if anyone could pass that along that'd be
great :)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jeff Tapper <jeff@spoon.as> wrote:
> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2wave@comcast.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:09 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs
>
> (PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread.
>
> Do we have general consensus on the following:
>
> (1) Vote is 5 points to be distributed to 1 to 5 of the logos as the voter
> determines.
>
> (2) Vote is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are binding and tabulated
> separately from the community. The PPMC is advised to reconsider if the
> community's opinion differs.
>
> (3) If multiple vote emails are received from any individual then the last
> one is counted and previous votes discarded.
>
> (4) There will be multiple rounds of voting.
>
> What criteria do we use to remove logos from next rounds? A suggestion. The
> bottom half of logos are removed. If there are an odd number of logos then
> the median is kept. (if 27 left then #14 is kept.) If any remaining logos
> (including the median) have less than N/2 votes where N is the number of
> voters then remove those too.
>
> (5) When do we declare a winner? A simple majority of the votes points cast.
>
> (6) How long is each round? A minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
>> Quoting Doug Arthur <dougarthur@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Mike started the entire voting process and has taken charge of it the
>>> entire time. I will put my trust in him to initiate a voting process
>>> and define the rules based on feedback received so far from everyone.
>>>
>>> I would at least, suggest to Mike, that he post a pre-proposal to the
>>> voting process, and if no one absolutely rejects, then proceed. The
>>> pre-proposal really shouldn't be a discussion, but rather a semi-vote
>>> (but not really a vote) to poll if there are any critical rejections
>>> whereas the majority don't agree with his direction.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents...
>>> - Doug
>>>
>>
>> Heh,
>>
>> I'm going to be honest here, this should have been concluded last week. I
> tried to get a consensus just for the plain reason of order, it didn't
> happen and you have this thread.
>>
>> I really don't think I want the target aimed at me on this. I tried my
> best to keep order up to this point(website, entires managed) but I really
> don't feel like making any decisions/proposals when this should have been
> agreed to last week.
>>
>> To many cooks in the kitchen people. I have also stayed away from this
> because of the polarity of PPMC votes to community votes.
>>
>> So now, whoever is louder take the baton and run!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message