incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Delamater <scott.delama...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Flex and Maven
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:41:46 GMT
Heh, of course. Now I just feel silly...

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Skogen, Espen <espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com>wrote:

> Apache has it's own maven repo. I certainly wouldn't encourage using SVN
> for a maven repo simulation:)
>
> It's available here: http://repository.apache.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P.
> Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ,  London, United Kingdom | T:
> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Delamater [mailto:scott.delamater@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2012 15:11
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Flex and Maven
>
> One consideration, though, is that Apache doesn't allow binaries in the
> source code. (Or maybe I've misunderstood some of the rules?) So our swcs
> would need to live in some other repo, which may be outside the
> responsibilities of this group. (Although it does seem like a good
> "extracurricular" activity for this group.)
>
> sD
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Gautam Pandey <gkp590@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 Yes we need better maven support for flex. Because of unavailability
> of
> > maven support  we r not migrating to newer version.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Gautam
> >  On Jan 13, 2012 5:34 AM, "Scott Delamater" <scott.delamater@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I agree, this would be a huge add for enterprise work.
> > >
> > > Especially with the recent XSS patch fiasco, having artifacts for the
> "A"
> > > variants of the SDKs available would've been a big help for our team at
> > > Shutterfly. I assume other enterprise consumers have generated similar
> > > artifacts, and assuming we were all willing to share those artifacts, I
> > > could see it being mutually beneficial.
> > >
> > > sD
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Remi P <rpatriar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > It's really a major point for entreprise developments that Flex SDK
> > > > artifacts can be deployed on central repo
> > > > Just for example, the last Adobe release of Flex SDK 4.6 has not yet
> > been
> > > > deployed on sonatype repository
> > > >
> > > > Remi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, John Childress <
> > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Michel Boudreau
> > > > > <michelboudreau@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 on this.  Totally agree that Flex should have better maven
> > > support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Greg Reddin <gredbug@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen
> > > > > > > <espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven
artifacts,
> > now
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > we get going?
> > > > > > > > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven
and
> > > Flexmojos
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache
> Flex
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately
> > > available
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > the Apache maven repo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those
who
> > prefer
> > > > > that
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > > it would just simplify the process for everybody using
> Flexmojos.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a
look at
> > it.
> > > > I'd
> > > > > > > really like to see us publish to Maven repos.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Michel Boudreau
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer." -
> Unofficial
> > > > motto
> > > > > of
> > > > > > the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > John Childress
> > > > > 713-234-0427
> > > > > john.childress@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message