incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com>
Subject Re: Flex Framework rsl's
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:27:55 GMT
I'm pretty sure that will never happen, Adobe will never sign something
that they're not responsible for.
If Apache releases an SDK with a glaring security hole in it somewhere,
Adobe will take the fall.
Sorry for being pessimistic, but I don't see it happening. But I'll be glad
to be proven wrong :)

On 5 January 2012 09:48, DiMiTRi <koro@noos.fr> wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com>
>
>
>
>  Adobe will not be caching RSLs from Apache so yes, we want to reduce the
>> need for caching RSLs in the future.
>>
>
> Alex, can you elaborate of the reasons of Adobe's choice?
> I really think the signed RSLs were one of the most important factor of
> Flex adoption, because it helped to convince clients that the framework
> size was not a real issue.
>
> Without it, the Apache Flex would start with a big step backward, that I
> fear could have great consequences to its future adoption.
>
> Can't Adobe and Apache work out a solution to maintain this important
> feature?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dimitri K.
>



-- 
regards,
Roland

-- 
Roland Zwaga
Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA

+32 (0)486 16 12 62 | roland@stackandheap.com | http://www.stackandheap.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message