incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Campos <jonbcam...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Flex SDK code conventions
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:57:10 GMT
Carol, we talked about this previously. I am right there with you about
uniform code. Big deal to me.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:

> There is a coding standard but unfortunately not everyone chose to follow
> it, or only followed the parts they liked.
>
> http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Coding+Conventions
>
> I am in favor of a coding standard.  I like uniform looking code.
>
> Carol
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Schmalle <mike@teotigraphix.com>
> Reply-To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:48:25 -0800
> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Flex SDK code conventions
>
> >I hate this topic but it needs to be asked to the community.
> >
> >Since I am an initial committer I will stand by whatever the consensus
> >is with the code I commit.
> >
> >But then the question, what are we doing about this?
> >
> >There is already ALOT of code in the sdk that uses different
> >conventions. I think this is ridiculous because it slows down
> >development switching from this format to that format (reading and
> >writing).
> >
> >I don't have an opinion on conventions, just proposing there needs to
> >be protocol with committers on this sooner than later. And this
> >protocol needs to be documented on a public page visible to any one
> >that has this same question creating patches.
> >
> >Mike
> >
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Campos
Dallas Flex User Group Manager
http://www.d-flex.org/
blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos
twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message