incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tomasz Maciąg | Fuse Collective <t.mac...@fusecollective.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] Logo contest round #2
Date Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:55:13 GMT
I've already wrote this but accidentally in "[VOTE] Logo contest round 
#2".  Iit could get lost between voting messages so I'm posting here again.

I'm very pleased that our logo made to the second round but I assumed 
there will be some sort of discussion after round 1.
I've imagined that people could express their feelings about selected 
logos (what they like, what they don't like or what they want to see) 
and based on that input we could work on our logo.
Additionally branding is not just logo so I thought that we could take 
some time to work on more complete branding presentation, with different 
logo variations, additional materials (e.g. t-shirts), may be key 
visual, example presentation on different use case scenarios (to discuss 
where and how the logo could be used by community or others). That could 
be later put to vote.
Voting already started, things are now in motion but I think this should 
be considered on todo list for winning logo...

W dniu 2012-01-24 08:13, David Arno pisze:
>> From: Doug Arthur [mailto:dougarthur@apache.org]
>> Sent: 23 January 2012 23:38
>>
>> Remember, PPMC members votes are the final say, and ultimately,
>> that will be the what final decision becomes, but the community votes
>> help the PPMC members make their decisions,
>> One specific concern was how #49 appeared to some of the PPMC members,
>> and feeling that some users could look at the logo as negative.
> It's great that the PPMC members are seeking the opinions of the community,
> but care needs to be taken over how that is done. Cynical people might read
> what you wrote as "the PPMC likes #42. The community voted for #49. Bearing
> in mind the negatives of #49, could the community re-vote please. Unless you
> overwhelmingly choose #49 though, the PPMC will choose #42 regardless of the
> result." If I were the designer of #49, I'd be pretty pee'd off over the
> biased tone of the announcement.
>
> Being a bloody-minded person at heart, even though I prefer #42, I'm tempted
> to vote for #49 just to counter the bias...
>
> David.
>

-- 
Tomasz Maciąg

t: +48 516 615 881
e: t.maciag@fusecollective.com

Fuse Collective Sp. z o.o.
Plac Wolności 12
91-415 Łódź
POLAND

t: +48 42 2920753
f: +48 42 2920758

hello@fusecollective.com
www.fusecollective.com

Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi, XX Wydział KRS: 0000358321

NIP: 7252023978, Regon: 100883396. Wysokość kapitału zakładowego: 10.000,00 zl

--
Informacja zawarta w tej wiadomości ma charakter poufny i objęta jest tajemnicą zawodową.
Wiadomość jest skierowana wyłącznie do osoby, która jest wymieniona w polu adresata.
Jeżeli osoba, która otrzymała mail, nie jest jego adresatem lub przedstawicielem adresata,
to niniejszym zostaje ona powiadomiona, że zapoznanie się z treścią, rozpowszechnianie
lub kopiowanie tego maila albo zawartych w nim informacji jest zakazane. W wypadku, gdy wiadomość
została otrzymana przez niewłaściwą osobę, uprzejmie proszę o natychmiastowe powiadomienie
o tym fakcie nadawcy i zniszczenie dokumentu. Jeśli niniejsza wiadomość stanowi, lub zawiera
jakikolwiek utwór w rozumieniu ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych, pozostaje
on pod ochroną jej przepisów i nie może zostać w jakikolwiek sposób wykorzystany.


This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and
delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
this e-mail is strictly forbidden.


Mime
View raw message