incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide to building the SDK (and a question))
Date Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:11:54 GMT
Does anyone have any idea why Alex suggested years? Was there a reason?

I am in agreement as well with what Omar stated, just curious why Alex  
would deviate from what most developers were expecting.

Mike

Quoting Yennick Trevels <yennick.trevels@gmail.com>:

> Simple, logical and easy to understand for "the outside world". Perfect imo.
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Campos <jonbcampos@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> It is also what I thought from the beginning.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > This version number scheme has been in my mind the entire time.  It makes
>> > complete sense.
>> >
>> > -Nick
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jeffry Houser <jeffry@dot-com-it.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 1/22/2012 9:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >  This approach seems logical enough to me and I have nothing else to
>> add.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jeffry Houser
>> > > Technical Entrepreneur
>> > > 203-379-0773
>> > > --
>> > > http://www.flextras.com?c=104
>> > > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
>> > > --
>> > > http://www.theflexshow.com
>> > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com
>> > > http://www.asktheflexpert.com
>> > > --
>> > > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Campos
>>
>




Mime
View raw message