Mailing-List: contact etch-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jacapps@cisco.com designates
 171.71.176.72 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
	type="multipart/alternative";
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9765F.A04D6FCD"
Subject: RE: [discuss] visuals(2).png
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:00 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <1A76C3336A7F9F428684F0E988303FEE056095F7@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <496E0768.5080607@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [discuss] visuals(2).png
Thread-Index: Acl2Xo/aR0690LgFSsSGXWc7bL+xrAAALByA
References: <496E06FB.9000108@cisco.com> <496E0768.5080607@cisco.com>
From: "Jan Capps (jacapps)" <jacapps@cisco.com>
To: <etch-dev@incubator.apache.org>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C9765F.A04D6FCD
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C9765F.A04D6FCD"


------_=_NextPart_002_01C9765F.A04D6FCD
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I like 3 and then 2.  I would be ok with either.  I don't think we need
to start over.  I do not like 1.

=20

Jan

=20

From: Scott Comer (sccomer)=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:40 AM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] visuals(2).png

=20

errgh. here is the attachment. i don't know why etch-dev likes to drop
it...


=20
scott comer (sccomer) wrote:=20

ok, so thien made us these fine logos. i think the summary of the
discussion was that i=20
liked 1 and 2 and james liked 3. nobody else really said much.=20

say what you like or not about these. if these are good and we should
vote, let's go.=20
if we need to start over, say that.=20

what do you say?=20

scott out=20


------_=_NextPart_002_01C9765F.A04D6FCD
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Tahoma;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
	color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body bgcolor=3Dwhite lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I like 3 and then 2.&nbsp; I would be ok with =
either.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t think
we need to start over.&nbsp; I do not like 1.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Jan<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt =
0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> Scott Comer (sccomer) <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:40 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> etch-dev@incubator.apache.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [discuss] visuals(2).png<o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal>errgh. here is the attachment. i don't know why =
etch-dev
likes to drop it...<br>
<br>
<br>
<img width=3D595 height=3D842 id=3D"_x0000_i1025"
src=3D"cid:image001.png@01C9762D.538E4B50"><br>
scott comer (sccomer) wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'>ok, so thien made us =
these fine
logos. i think the summary of the discussion was that i <br>
liked 1 and 2 and james liked 3. nobody else really said much. <br>
<br>
say what you like or not about these. if these are good and we should =
vote,
let's go. <br>
if we need to start over, say that. <br>
<br>
what do you say? <br>
<br>
scott out <o:p></o:p></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------_=_NextPart_002_01C9765F.A04D6FCD--

------_=_NextPart_001_01C9765F.A04D6FCD--