incubator-etch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "scott comer (sccomer)" <scco...@cisco.com>
Subject Re: i about done with java refactoring...
Date Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:41:40 GMT
i'm done with the major structural changes. you may fool with the java 
code and build scripts. i'm
still holding the lock on the csharp binding runtime, csharp tests and 
examples, and all the csprojs.

scott out

James Dixson wrote:
> I agree. I think we should rename the C# packages as well it makes sense.
>
> .. Are you about to release your virtual lock on trunk ... Others would like
> to check-in code too :-)
>
> --
> James
>
>
>
> On 1/28/09 3:06 PM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sccomer@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> and remember now that i forgot to ask what we should do about the etch
>> for csharp package names.
>>
>> while java runtime package names are now org.apache.etch.util.* and
>> org.apache.etch.bindings.java.*,
>> the csharp names have always been simpler: Etch.*
>>
>> It seems like they should be Org.Apache.Etch.Bindings.Csharp.*
>>
>> this allows other csharp bindings than just the one we have.
>>
>> scott out
>>
>>     
> 6
>
>
>   

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message