incubator-etch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "scott comer (sccomer)" <scco...@cisco.com>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: missing pictures...]
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:17:21 GMT
nice, #1. i really like it.

etch committers, any comments? are we ready to vote?

scott out

Thien wrote:
> Hi,
> Didn't do much, I only added more blue to the start of the gradient.
>
> I think solid underline might be better, since the logotype already 
> has gradient, another one for the underline seems over and it also 
> steal some attention off the logotype.
>
> https://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/laboratory/users/thien/etch/visuals.png
>
> Thien
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:58 AM, scott comer <sccomer@cisco.com 
> <mailto:sccomer@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     the less floaty is good. it also adds some terminal emphasis,
>     like, OK! the color gradient
>     suggests ink drying, or perhaps invisible ink being revealed. i
>     like it.
>
>     i like #3. wife suggested that the gradient on the word etch have
>     more blue at the start.
>
>     #4 would be good, too, but i think it weakens the impact of the
>     underline. that could be
>     good because we do not want to suggest too much finality (heh,
>     etched in stone).
>
>     i think we are very close. thanks so much for your effort, thien.
>
>     scott out
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message