Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16011 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 08:55:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 08:55:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 82717 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 08:55:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82643 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 08:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82632 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2010 08:55:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:55:35 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so671662wyb.6 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:55:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M6RpaRKee+IMnl546my0b/lJXevQ7wTFGZ/aLdlMxXA=; b=iM2GnaUIj/FihaivZ48NiS/kSbhOKVs2Sp65VX8IqF6yyx5xrwuO3D7SMS6Z8t5ccI IOeRFVjqQQ6ucNVf22nKpwNpuI4G2DII+fGkuSh0IYTOsc0WmHMB/tKxgb8qq0r54oRI 15DrV8bmZgX/RsBphSAwh9RozdWZ79T0mc4c8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=p7MyEShq+WMpFF6Ofd5WFAqh0eGQc2br8bsXQPKu0sx3q8vgfY0xYrs4jYlG0DQcdi y0CkRpPyz3rQDGsfy+1iiKU7No78KEIEumGnDqGrIxHZSwcI7Sg4SmZCCxjd8DhOqx+3 5EYPFAKEk1UGlcSD8HaWXH5LUv2LoHrGWV5eA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.22.70 with SMTP id s48mr3646829wes.27.1290675313637; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.74.69 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:55:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:55:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Discussion of LDAP on lift list From: Ethan Jewett To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the heads-up. This prompted me to resubscribe to the Lift list := -) I really won't have time to look at this for a few more days :-( I'll keep an eye on the conversation for now. Ethan On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote: > Don't know whether anyone else is following the discussions about LDAP > on the lift list. They are currently doing a major rewrite of the code > and I'm trying to talk about our (ESME) requirements > (http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/54c3d08ed6f0= 2b11) > . =A0If anyone else wants to chime in, that would be great. I can give > basic requirements but they are asking for more details for the entire > module which is a bit of challenge for me based on my still limited > understanding of the lift internals. > > D. >