Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94306 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2010 07:12:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Sep 2010 07:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 48071 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2010 07:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48010 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2010 07:12:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48002 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2010 07:12:09 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:12:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of in.imtiaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:11:45 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2198376iwn.6 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:11:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:subject :date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=M7jxlyDl5eB1Ld2OrVCUZtPbFAb66UO8bBna2RwMZDw=; b=vZj/t2qa8QBvAarxKfya08w2uW8qhNSwKilwu+Rn7HVilMPBVtInUUAtH5YK5bal18 gD0OEaQi27hQJBERsfqsNvA2HqPjjao5oH+GnQw7LslWZBvM1PLxTAGD/CahoAhOtgi2 5+kRyfrkb2Avy1R46hgEcO2V8DyIOx+C8vuCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=Vuwkx+V+7puYeQngNQQpDAhEtboWxWkr0IwojXuw7ovRR0XBucYnhntPyfNHl4VtJi OmAsWgw/z/2Ornfjxt561qUIiqe5LD+DTBkNraWK3ZOR4WKM/7lp6CFKLZBGMmJ9J+uN MozcaWY5ZfNE8VshgOaGod6qrbrQTP8RrPwNk= Received: by 10.231.167.146 with SMTP id q18mr2266211iby.152.1283584283329; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imtiaz20100131 ([122.167.41.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm2951337ibk.15.2010.09.04.00.11.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18D2DB57E5FD43B0A44F299209166660@imtiaz20100131> From: "Imtiaz Ahmed H E" To: Subject: Is doing PubSubHubub worth it ? Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:41:16 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB4C2E.771CE4E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB4C2E.771CE4E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please don't misconstrue me, I would have (and already started having) = my usual ball doing it!=20 But at http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/wiki/Companies there are only a handful of companies who have advertised themselves as = doing (supporting a hub for their feeds) it. Of course, Ethan probably knows better... What do you think ? Dick ? Maybe there's lots of other stuff that would really help Esme. But, = pubsubhubub is a really worthwhile api/concept in itself... Imtiaz ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB4C2E.771CE4E0--