incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.1 - Second vote
Date Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:56:45 GMT
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>...
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/trunk/THIRD-PARTY.txt
>>
>> Format looks ok but I don't think we can release with dependencies
>> that have unknown licenses.
>> Those should be tracked down or eliminated, IMO.
>
> But I added in the file "We've tracked down the licenses for these
> dependents accordingly: " with the details lower in the file. Do we
> need more than that?

Ah sorry, didn't realize the last paragraph refers to those licenses, my bad.

I have reformatted that file to make things clearer, and I think asm
and cglib still need clarification, if I read your mvn site output
correctly.

-Bertrand

Mime
View raw message