Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of in.imtiaz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority
         :x-mailer:x-mimeole;
        b=M9A1/jrjF7xv9PFALXidLAsW/UbROQLlycMnHbC2q/yPhjedeSJD1lA9UjjFHdwxH/
         f4LnyZHEtim+c0aQgnU7DZk8PSBYZ9NDgB70m2+HqwjNZv3wqZFx1lq7mc9a39+CRlT4
         A0CWZ8LiDELRn0sgQYNg2Iag58YdgCm+C3+Bo=
Message-ID: <A7459C72DFB44D868C67D78BB27025AF@imtiaz20100131>
From: "Imtiaz Ahmed H E" <in.imtiaz@gmail.com>
To: <esme-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: 
 <AANLkTimkXxNQJGhThAnF9pjW_qifg0pPmJfZvbaSytk6@mail.gmail.com><E024226623E24ABE96F35839ABF2861C@imtiaz20100131><AANLkTinv-B+KfCU9jJ3W3P_uXtUc4PEUJtwgCrv6HQYh@mail.gmail.com><2301F260E2DF4D3D9D6AB910007E404A@imtiaz20100131>
 <AANLkTinshmYp0noZrNA-WN4_QnN-mHWLy1OyC9oMSSzY@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:45:04 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

By the way, streams.html (relevant to this bug)  in trunk is different from 
the one in tags.

Can somebody clarify...

What is tags about, more generally ?

Thanks
Imtiaz

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
To: <esme-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs


The last stax deplyoment  (
http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
2010.

D.

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in.imtiaz@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the 
> date
> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see 
> what
> happened.
>
> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" 
> <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> To: <esme-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>> that it works there.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in.imtiaz@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>
>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, 
>>> this
>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>> done
>>> asap.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>> <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>>> To: <esme-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>
>>>
>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>
>