Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11439 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 05:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 05:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 973 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 05:04:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 951 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 05:04:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 943 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 05:04:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:04:30 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so952594ewy.36 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:04:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=Dv+FvuKD3kByAdZmVBi3HE2k8VyISmYgNhVe0iKBtIU=; b=LsLThaDOM3GULq+b4ZB5ZDRji+kAMje3vCx2w75IGx1qXigilVo96TBXe/K9f89VKq T93z63CtdJB4WgkQ4IWZSwWLeKJRlaUwZsbkgDk6zbbj0XrIurJK+d8PFqZp+3Q6fFP8 njzJWLQubMlAmiCZeKrE1D1GRIVt+bfIr/vMU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=XI16fetuA9MpsNKrimXW5spxJ2gg/cS0QReyPFZc28bTKV2S8c8j/08MD+Lb3EnCpI mHz3RJ3gXlks1LccVOYSNplpVUCsXWtnqGQd0DXF5ayOkvr4pINfdVyJAzEaew3ythL8 92xYpf4jTvTCKAZJ0ggNDb7bDYMwndRVNSoUo= Received: by 10.213.109.91 with SMTP id i27mr7459621ebp.3.1268888648337; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dzcpi0d9e007.i04.local (users.intility.com [193.71.38.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm1326362ewy.4.2010.03.17.22.04.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: RC2 - are we ready? From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:04:07 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0E9FBC59-7CC7-4A43-B474-09C408CAD0F7@gmail.com> References: To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) All the tasks for RC2 in Jira are fixed, so I'd say go for it :-) On 18. mars 2010, at 05.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: > Should we wait a bit or should I cut a RC2 based on the previously tagged > RC1? > > We may just want to go for a 1.0 without the "RC" desscription. > > D.