incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release?
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:40:17 GMT
Here is the code:

http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/211/diff/1/

Looks pretty straight-forward.

we still need an ldap to use a test: ldap.bigfoot.com:389 seens like a  good
choice

http://raleigh.pm.org/ldap-talk.html

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have tried to follow that discussion as best I could too.
> If we start to use it, it might also speed things up a bit. There is
> nothing better for a developer than seeing his work being implemented and
> used :-)
>
> - anne
>
>
> On 18. mars 2010, at 19.24, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>
> > Based on what I've seen on the lift mailing list, the LDAP support in
> lift
> > is still in its early stages but it should still provide an excellent
> start
> > for us.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't really have an opinion about LDAP aside from thinking that we
> >> need it. I definitely support this approach.
> >>
> >> Ethan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>> Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next
> >> release.
> >>> Everything else goes into the backlog.
> >>>
> >>> D.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are
in
> >>>>> releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than
the
> >>>>> backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that
> item
> >>>>> is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed,
I
> >>>>> think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different
> >>>>> (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too
> >> much
> >>>> water over our heads.
> >>>>
> >>>>> With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or
LDAP
> >>>>> support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as
> >>>>> important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not,
> >>>>> let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving
> >>>>> to Lift 2.0 until that point).
> >>>>
> >>>> LDAP support is important.
> >>>> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't
> support
> >>>> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ethan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged
for the
> >> 1.1
> >>>> release.
> >>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135)
> >>>>>> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1.1  with UI
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Which release do you refer to as next?
> >>>>>>>> If RC2 I'd say no.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - anne
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next
release? We would
> >> get
> >>>>>>>> LDAP
> >>>>>>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch....
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> D.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message