incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.0 Snapshot for next release?
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:24:26 GMT
Based on what I've seen on the lift mailing list, the LDAP support in lift
is still in its early stages but it should still provide an excellent start
for us.

D.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't really have an opinion about LDAP aside from thinking that we
> need it. I definitely support this approach.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next
> release.
> > Everything else goes into the backlog.
> >
> > D.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> > <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in
> >> > releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the
> >> > backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item
> >> > is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I
> >> > think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different
> >> > (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-)
> >> >
> >> +1
> >> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too
> much
> >> water over our heads.
> >>
> >> > With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP
> >> > support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as
> >> > important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not,
> >> > let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving
> >> > to Lift 2.0 until that point).
> >>
> >> LDAP support is important.
> >> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support
> >> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Ethan
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> > <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the
> 1.1
> >> release.
> >> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135)
> >> >> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> 1.1  with UI
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>> <yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Which release do you refer to as next?
> >> >>>> If RC2 I'd say no.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> - anne
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release?
We would
> get
> >> >>>> LDAP
> >> >>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch....
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> D.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message