incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sig Rinde <...@rinde.com>
Subject Re: Timeline broken on http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net/user/esjewett
Date Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:54:28 GMT
In my case I'm logged on the webinterface as api_test the
administrator and can see messages from all (?) participants from
different pools, but it's missing some of the messages from same.
Cannot even see a pattern here...



On 10 March 2010 15:49, Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org> wrote:
> Ethan, are all of the top messages in your timeline from a pool? Try
> sending a message to the public pool and see if it shows up.
>
> I think this is a case where pool security kicks in. In short, all DB
> queries related to messages are modified so that they only return
> messages from the user's pools. The interesting part is that you
> should be able to see all your messages if you're logged in with the
> same user.
>
> What this means is that queries that are restricted by count shouldn't
> depend on another query executed independently before it. If the whole
> thing is not executed as one query, the count from the first query
> might be reduced in the second. In most instances ESME does the right
> thing, but AFAIK this is the only place where the expected number of
> messages might be reduced.
>
> I'll try to integrate this in a single query and see if it works.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org> wrote:
>> Interesting, but the timeline of all other users I tried shows fine
>> (at least 7-8 of them).
>>
>> I'll check it out and also try to convert it to the more unified
>> timeline layout.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does anyone have any idea why my timeline doesn't have any messages in
>>> it at http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net/user/esjewett
>>> ?
>>>
>>> I think it's been like this for ages, but I've just sort of assumed it
>>> was meant to be that way. The new UI (awesome, by the way!!!!!) makes
>>> it obvious that it shouldn't be that way.
>>>
>>> Thoughts? Maybe I have some sort of rogue filter action that I need to
>>> track down....
>>>
>>> Ethan
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message