incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ESME in Commercial Products
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:43:04 GMT
Agreed.

I'm assuming that such differences are covered by the Apache License itself.

D.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Sig Rinde <sig@rinde.com> wrote:
> And I suspect the crucial point is what is meant by "use in commercial
> products" :)
>
> We, Thingamy, only connects to ESME, itself running unaltered on it's
> own - so when we "deliver" we just include a link to ESME for the
> usual download and set-up. So guess we're more of the "use _by_.."
> instead.
>
> Sig
>
> On 1 February 2010 10:32, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When ESME is released (which is our main priority right now), this
>> will happen based on the Apache License, which allows it to be used in
>> commercial products - see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
>>
>> At the moment, there are a few files in the ESME source code that have
>> more restrictive licenses that do not allow them to be redistributed
>> in an Apache release. We are currently in the process of fixing this
>> issue.
>>
>> If you want, you can use ESME code right now for testing or any other
>> purposes, but our SVN might occasionally contain code with more
>> restrictive licenses than the Apache License, which will be cleaned up
>> before the release.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Uday Subbarayan
>> <uday.subbarayan@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>     Is there any issues in using ESME in a commercial product?
>>>
>>> *I am not able to follow all the legal issues going on in the list including
LGPL, etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uday.
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> I do not blog but e-write:
>>>
>>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message