incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
Date Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:15:15 GMT
Ahhhhh, I had Daniel's Java client in mind. Ok, sounds good. I will
give my +1 on the other thread once I am able to download and build
this weekend.

Thanks,
Ethan

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought about removing the client but then where would you put it.
> It seems a waste to just delete it. The java client was included in
> the initial code drop, so I didn't really think that dropping without
> a vote would be correct.
>
> I had to do something, because the esme-java-client files were part of
> the trunk but without the correct license. The release would have
> failed if someone looked at these files and saw that they didn't have
> apache licenses.
>
> IMHO: Once we get this release out the door, then we can vote on
> deleting it.  Maybe, we can place it somewhere else (GoogleCode?)
> where it can still be used.
>
> D.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, that's fine by me.
>>
>> I'm a little confused though. Why can't you remove it without a vote?
>> And why not just remove it for the purposes of the release?
>>
>> I've come around on the idea of including it, as long as someone is
>> working on it, but it was added without a vote so it seems that it
>> should be possible to remove it without a vote ;-)
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It is going to be more complicated than I expected.
>>>
>>> I just can't remove the esme-java-client from the trunk without a vote.
>>>
>>> I'm going to add the licensing info to the files in that directory and
>>> then update the readme accordingly.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> got to change my vote to a -1.
>>>>
>>>> The tar includes the "esme-java-client" directory which we probably
>>>> don't want to release and doesn't have any Apache licenses.
>>>>
>>>> I'll cut a new tar and then create a new vote.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry.
>>>>
>>>> As they say, practice makes perfect.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, dhague@fortybeans.com
>>>> <dhague@fortybeans.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1 from me, and major kudos to Dick & Anne for the release work and
legal
>>>>> clearances.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Darren
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 February 2010 at 21:45 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed
>>>>>> within the ESME podling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The candidate can be found at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
>>>>>> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1.0-incubating
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-src.tar.gz release
package
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> 4B B4 C8 5C 01 FD 29 F5  73 F3 E5 05 4D 0E DC 1F
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
>>>>>> a majority of at least three +1  ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming
>>>>>> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating
>>>>>>    [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's my +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your patience with me as manager of this release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dick Hirsch
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message