Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75240 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 20:09:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 20:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 6964 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 20:09:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6900 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 20:09:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6890 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2010 20:09:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:09:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.226] (HELO mail-bw0-f226.google.com) (209.85.218.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:09:25 +0000 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so5024508bwz.27 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:09:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L2gHZy5lLSaF718igdBBVnh0myqGMmsm8uJIa0sED+s=; b=ABu5Sg3jIMAt6FSR22VsGbi45vQkpKUfxvt2pC8A9jDE/VSzAwA6mkkVw2tdwPg5lT QuP6ajYRMvbQJOH7FzcBkM+Yv2T4iI1iQbfjVmE+o8toDThhtsF2DdLManoL64+LapCK DW8CFaCwrTjlkviSlgtwUJmq63eYhdk83cEuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=n5VFFfKr9LRHqrB0J1ZyPiC+nCDNoM+26QDLDVH6YPzwLoe8Ciw7CN7zcFp3+oeeVw TYprhb8IEy2rY8Aab2gm755WoTE52ozMIaXcmsM15az1AcxxPgKsO9APCiK7nZ9+XpG5 VyPp2bzRNLt+mC4M5J/0kLLPz2qshIB8dfnpc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.16.194 with SMTP id p2mr657692bka.32.1264622944716; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:09:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <973652.34871.qm@web54402.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <452848.49785.qm@web54408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <41B50092-5857-4F56-80D0-1F43354E08B2@gmail.com> <100862.66997.qm@web54409.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <601081.38150.qm@web54407.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <633377.54162.qm@web54404.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <254EC87D-0108-4DFE-A642-BC39FE39BE2F@gmail.com> <973652.34871.qm@web54402.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:09:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555abea65085e047e2af9ac X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555abea65085e047e2af9ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable @anne: Thanks again for making these svn commits. woot! On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote= : > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at > > http://git.apache.org/ > > > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But > if others use it, it makes sense to request support > for git. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > > To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just dele= te > it > > now. > > Or is anyone still using it? > > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs > > > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do > > > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. > > > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git > > > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. > > > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all > > > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested > > > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out > > > of svn. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > >> From: Joe Schaefer > > >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM > > >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >> > > >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends > > >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files > > >> need to be at the base directory of the package. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ---- > > >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > > >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >>> > > >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. > > >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? > > >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > >>> > > >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the > trunk. > > >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. > > >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has > > >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree > > >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding > > >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > > >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks Joe. > > >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > > >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM > > >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "So= me > > >> Licensing > > >>> > > >>>>>>> Nits". > > >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> /Anne > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's > copyright > > >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> __________________________________________________ > > >>>> Do You Yahoo!? > > >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > > >> > > >> > > >> __________________________________________________ > > >> Do You Yahoo!? > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --00032555abea65085e047e2af9ac--