Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76076 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 12:34:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 12:34:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 63798 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 12:34:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63742 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 12:34:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63732 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 12:34:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:34:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.212] (HELO mail-ew0-f212.google.com) (209.85.219.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:34:24 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2013817ewy.27 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:34:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=xd1eUCH3GUqSQt3Qm2Va+kHvV1SN79+1zReYJ1pqnuw=; b=AjNT0aRFvTji72RID1Bclr1Z/6vYx2SmFLaespZH4YpR6g4SlNdbS2S0SQkbpay6wc oQ4PFGy9B+GMPD4K2gZ473I2c1k2vF+aMXjs9cOC8gm+DucGBpxLDvzl4a1SIfhRsVU7 SCqv6kaTD7jHDE6ZbZaSYs5alazQGABbpN1DQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=LNzpch3YUT9AAH/WDiUN3hVzlW1kAAoXuU4tuTHR3ZCUXZlhfg61L9nvJTwiAGBF/K v1CLRM335HHPNADEDmke8XHSD+p+1zvicrptc+oZXP6C62LskJ6/bnPByn0/fiuVT75z a58257hmTlA9Ww0MbAG4FcN73DPq7QDXTkR7I= Received: by 10.213.100.197 with SMTP id z5mr657427ebn.93.1264768442871; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:34:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.40.114.123? (users.intility.com [193.71.38.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm3730288eyx.22.2010.01.29.04.34.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:34:02 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Anne_Kathrine_Petter=F8e?= In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:33:53 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <526F3543-ACB3-470F-9742-12FC88A18C9C@gmail.com> References: <58E57892-DAA4-4C97-81D4-E5B6F5567A0A@gmail.com> <5AB1C651-F451-4AF4-9AA8-99FAB9496CF1@gmail.com> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 29. jan. 2010, at 13.30, Richard Hirsch wrote: > Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. If its MIT > license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing > with third party works. >=20 > BTW, don't know whether jquery is even necessary with new UI.... Depends how much we want to do, but yes we do need it. Maybe not now, = but down the line. For instance for showing threaded conversations inline (like Facebook = currently does it in their news feed) >=20 > On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e wrote: >> I don't want to have *any* LGPL/GPL stuff in our code. >> I'd rather try to see if we can find other libraries/scripts to use = for our >> UI. >>=20 >> /Anne >>=20 >>=20 >> On 29. jan. 2010, at 12.10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Richard Hirsch = >>> wrote: >>>> ...maven-based solution might be more useful... >>>=20 >>> If what you mean is maven automatically downloading GPL/LGPL stuff = at >>> build time, that's not ok. >>>=20 >>> Unless there's a big prominent warning that people cannot miss, and >>> then only if those components are optional. >>>=20 >>> The key is that whatever is required to use what we release (which = is >>> source code - binary releases are a convenience only) must have an >>> acceptable license according to = http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>=20 >>> This is just to clarify for everybody, I don't mean you're doing >>> things wrong ;-) >>>=20 >>> -Bertrand >>=20 >>=20