incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...)
Date Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:28:18 GMT
accordian isn't used but tabs are...

maven-based solution might be more useful

On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should just throw out the Accordion too, we aren't using it
> currently anyway. (it was part of the UI started last year)
> Better be safe than sorry.
>
> Thanks for going through this.
>
> /Anne
>
> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.53, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>
>> I think we can delete the following files can be deleted:
>>
>> wz_tooltip.js + all the other js files that start with tip_
>>
>> The files starting with "ui." appear to be jQuery scripts (
>> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Accordion)  but do not have a license header
>> in our SVN. If you look at this link
>> (http://jqueryui.com/latest/ui/ui.core.js), you will see that they are
>> dual licensed.
>>
>> D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/29/10, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Get rid of them immediately is all I have to say.
>>> We cannot have LGPL licensed scripts in our code.
>>>
>>> /Anne
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 10.40, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make
>>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> I think many of these files are old ones that are no longer necessary.
>>>> Most are linked to the old UI any way....
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Him
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> ...We also scripts in SVN with various copyrights. What do we need
and
>>>>>> what can we toss. Is there a way to pull in these scripts via the
>>>>>> build process so that we are not part of our SVN?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are few examples below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-1.3.2.min.js?view=markup).
>>>>>
>>>>> This one's fine, MIT license is ok according to
>>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>>> but the license header must remain intact, see "third-party works" in
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/tip_balloon.js?view=markup
>>>>>
>>>>> This one's unclear, but according to the next one which is from the
>>>>> same source I'd guess it's LGPL, so not good.
>>>>> Anyway it doesn't indicate permission to redistribute - to be checked.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/scripts/wz_tooltip.js?view=markup
>>>>>
>>>>> This one's LGPL as indicated in the header, so it has to go (see
>>>>> http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html).
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's required for ESME to work, an alternate solution has to be
>>>>> found.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's optional, instructing users to download it separately is fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Under NO circumstances should license headers of third-party code be
>>>>> removed in Apache code repositories - if you see any more LGPL/GPL
>>>>> stuff in ESME's SVN please discuss that here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created ESME-154 and made it a blocker for Release 1.0, to make
>>>>> sure a general review of such code is done before the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bertrand
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message