incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:04:05 GMT
+1

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
<yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:

> Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-)
>
> We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned that
> we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
>
>
> On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote:
>
> > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done.
> > Thanks Joe and Daniel.
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
> >> server.  There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
> >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>
> >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> >>> though.
> >>>
> >>> Ethan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> >>>>
> >>>> http://git.apache.org/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request.  But
> >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> >>>> for git.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just
> delete it
> >>>>> now.
> >>>>> Or is anyone still using it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file.  If the devs
> >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> >>>>>> of svn.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess.  It really depends
> >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those
files
> >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this
one I assume?
> >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt
file to
> the
> >>> trunk.
> >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the
trunk as well.
> >>>>>>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay
where it is?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now.
 What has
> >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the
svn tree
> >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/.  And where is the corresponding
> >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME?  NOTICE should be right next
to that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is
now closed
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22
PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits"
is now closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that
I just closed ESME-47
> "Some
> >>>>>>> Licensing
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits".
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has
helped resolve this issue!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well done.  Technically there should be
a line for Apache's
> copyright
> >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE
file as well, see
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
> >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
> >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message