incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:17:29 GMT
Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn
server.  There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do
to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:


http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache



----- Original Message ----
> From: Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM
> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> 
> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
> though.
> 
> Ethan
> 
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
> >
> > http://git.apache.org/
> >
> >
> > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request.  But
> > if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> > for git.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe 
> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >>
> >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
> >> now.
> >> Or is anyone still using it?
> >>
> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>
> >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file.  If the devs
> >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
> >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
> >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
> >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
> >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
> >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
> >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
> >> > of svn.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>
> >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess.  It really depends
> >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
> >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
> >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
> >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to
the 
> trunk.
> >> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
> >> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it
is?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now.  What has
> >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
> >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/.  And where is the corresponding
> >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME?  NOTICE should be right next to that.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
> >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
> >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> >> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
> >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed
ESME-47 "Some
> >> >> Licensing
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>> Nits".
> >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve
this issue!
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> /Anne
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Well done.  Technically there should be a line for
Apache's copyright
> >> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well,
see
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Mime
View raw message