incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:13:16 GMT
Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I
do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my
git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure
though.

Ethan

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at
>
> http://git.apache.org/
>
>
> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I
> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request.  But
> if others use it, it makes sense to request support
> for git.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yojibee@gmail.com>
>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM
>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>>
>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it
>> now.
>> Or is anyone still using it?
>>
>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file.  If the devs
>> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do
>> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure.
>> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git
>> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well.
>> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all
>> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested
>> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out
>> > of svn.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> >> From: Joe Schaefer
>> >> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>
>> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess.  It really depends
>> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files
>> >> need to be at the base directory of the package.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----
>> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>>
>> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now.
>> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume?
>> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> >>>
>> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the
trunk.
>> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well.
>> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now.  What has
>> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree
>> >>>> instead of inside trunk/.  And where is the corresponding
>> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME?  NOTICE should be right next to that.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks Joe.
>> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
>> >>>>>>> To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM
>> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed
ESME-47 "Some
>> >> Licensing
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>> Nits".
>> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this
issue!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> /Anne
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Well done.  Technically there should be a line for Apache's
copyright
>> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well,
see
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> __________________________________________________
>> >>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message