incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Dealing with copyright issue (See ESME-47)
Date Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:23:07 GMT
I wasn't closing the vote, just posting the current status ;-)

/Anne


On 13. jan. 2010, at 11.17, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> Please note that the vote officially lasts 72 hours.  We can't close
> the vote until then.
> 
> D.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe
> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just to sum up the vote so far.
>> 
>> ESME PPMC +1: 6
>> IMPC +1: 3
>> IMPC -1: 1
>> 
>> We would need one more IMPC +1 vote to ratify the ESME team vote right?
>> 
>> /Anne
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 13. jan. 2010, at 09.07, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Gianugo Rabellino
>>> <g.rabellino@sourcesense.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>>>>> ... In the future should this issue ever present itself to you,
>>>>> I hope you will do the proper thing and point the errant person
>>>>> at the relevant ASF policy
>>>> 
>>>> That would be the same policy that says we _must_ remove copyright
>>>> notices from source files, right? The same policy that is now being
>>>> discarded in light of a compromise that makes very little sense and
>>>> sets a dangerous precedent?...
>>> 
>>> I don't think we're discarding the policy.
>>> 
>>> David is prevented from making any more commits that contradict this
>>> policy (as he left, but otherwise I would have asked for a vote to
>>> revoke his commit rights as suggested on the legal-disccus list), and
>>> we are treating the remaining copyright notices in the same way as
>>> we'd do for a committer that is no longer available (for any reason)
>>> to fix them themselves.
>>> 
>>> Clarifying that we'd revoke people's commit rights if they refuse to
>>> abide by the policy that we're talking about
>>> (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html) has been a positive
>>> outcome of this saga, IMHO.
>>> 
>>> -Bertrand
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message