Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78901 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2009 08:49:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 08:49:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 88039 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 08:49:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87985 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 08:49:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87975 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2009 08:49:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:49:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markus.kohler@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.219] (HELO mail-gx0-f219.google.com) (209.85.217.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:49:16 +0000 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so3153142gxk.0 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:48:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0ogIBdU967sT01fpiIqTzWT96rSoKvTnMqf7G4JbVZk=; b=a+at502CA63NWvFXwlyOfSpOOz5vY1whHJi7RjP1IyUz/X0n0cqLd/NdgAIzTYnUST 4Emx/iGgeN8bou046UzR3qO+Nij3albOMjdb4S3y6l3lOt62gBCX4GR7tRKj7vbWpo21 jLk9nehbeQYRLfHLSrvGBslw7S0TcZm5y0OME= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RSbTZk+DjAAN2luYGDnekAg2telnhsPrdJej7qAuHUFWHbcBnazMQNFvI1x+1a5zq7 6kIz4Y3MYD0QxrPwdcUFsICdfiRlAmr/ZfVtLrN3OQ3ZV+cmTR93vOCYBlk80Wona6gD XDjS1iz9NoL5XcEdVQXJDLv/DrOV1qpP5QOhg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.56.14 with SMTP id i14mr5963303agk.108.1260866935535; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:48:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <771905290912150012n7747be85h4ca1b7dff59e6e65@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:48:55 +0100 Message-ID: <771905290912150048w2f710a7cm70cef924f85a3874@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Short update: load tests and CE From: Markus Kohler To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f860b8cd3a5c047ac07564 --001485f860b8cd3a5c047ac07564 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dick, The idea was that 7.2 runs on JDK 1.6 and the chances that ESME would run out of the box would be higher than with 7.1 which runs on JDK 1.5. I have never seen ESME running on JDK1.5, and therefore I suspect that the issue might just be caused by the JDK version. Regards, Markus "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote: > I'd try using a normal 7.1 CE first. I've had enough trouble getting > it to work in that environment. > > D. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Markus Kohler > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just a short update from my side > > I tried to get some load tests running last night, and I was almost > > successful. > > The test is still buggy, there seems to be a multi threading issue and > it's > > not exactly doing what it is supposed to do, but I got some hints how to > fix > > it. > > > > I also wanted to try to get ESME running on CE 7.20, and tried to install > > the latest CE version. Unfortunately that turned out to be an uphill > battle, > > in short it just didn't work. > > I have to find a recent version that works on my machine. > > > > > > Regards, > > Markus > > > > "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay > > > --001485f860b8cd3a5c047ac07564--