Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91214 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 23:30:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 23:30:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 96155 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 23:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96107 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 23:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96097 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 23:30:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:30:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markus.kohler@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.174] (HELO mail-yx0-f174.google.com) (209.85.210.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:30:31 +0000 Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4so5296800yxe.32 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=rXy8KWPSgocjLjrRd4vozKxzVX4cUcG48Hp58AAoT8o=; b=fdPd95o2uQx83Ftz2kPS0otjnT9+b8Pj8RLVAD7DRpGlhckcCC4spjYP5kMmEyP7tL M2It9fiHwwjCo3ML2wkUiQqB+jqfCelXzB70ejTZVKLyVIOhajM7yTz5frRUYL+BAewa 5zMDWZn0UEO+NGBFIPvbmLtGiy15Aa3TKVluE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=l3RAVBvd3mELB880nbL4lxwlhuI2ZPi140oxyZp8P8ikjZi0TGnhLpzgJbFcwy7mCd XOk0ZyKZmIwsfzpBwhcf3ls5GWKCvdkAQ4aeP68450Ro8qN7qiwJgigmCiEBKRl13Ay2 eRfICM582oclOhE1dvf8KwFwRP48B23a0I6Bg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.23.21 with SMTP id 21mr1204555agw.59.1259019007799; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:30:07 +0100 Message-ID: <771905290911231530s28817fbcpa815ddbfced8a9ad@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Memory allocation analysis From: Markus Kohler To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00148534bcbab9b3be047912340f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00148534bcbab9b3be047912340f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I just sent Richard the brief memory allocation analysis. It doesn't make sense to post it here without attachements. The short summary is, that I don't think it makes sense to put a lot of work into optimizing it. Markus "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay --00148534bcbab9b3be047912340f--