Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=q6ENTpmkavRkxe5L/5Sq7mibec1rxXFE7oiZyJUMOZmkJEXMCMP5u+ghVbbPjF/Kfo
         vJ80OEwTRDWR1dewkHyy9u0K+lADUd/FNSJCWIvbAtyTW6eW1gDgZha0FYV2IAkT70NT
         r6y2USOtD+Q59HOerU5VqHVqe3DHtcly58jMc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c7fc82820910300258s6e1d05w479fb6bae14b77ef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <68f4a0e80910270655g77db6321m53f8757a9ab115b2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c7fc82820910270855h5b0fcd43t3f67123cdd1c014c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <68f4a0e80910290938x2614b4e6r5a4e05fa69f0ebb2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fa2d9f450910291047s5f61f908x30e9e45b5359e405@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c7fc82820910300258s6e1d05w479fb6bae14b77ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:56:53 -0500
Message-ID: <68f4a0e80911100556q23fc9b37m68d7e3a056a3c078@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Actions, tags, and the public timeline
From: Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Just bumping this up again, as I kind of forgot about it. Vassil, what
would this syntax to specify a tag or pool for a new message look
like? I assume it would be different for resend vs. messages generated
from feeds.

Maybe we can work out what the action command should look like and
then create a JIRA ticket for it.

Ethan

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org> wrote:
>> I think the idea of specifying a pool for the results of an action is
>> good idea. We just need a new action "resend [pool] -- sends the
>> message to a particular pool"
>
> Not exactly. First of all, on the ESME specification or on the mailing
> list there was a specific requirement *not* to move a message from one
> pool to another automatically- only by a very explicit copy/paste by
> the user. Second, the messages from Atom/RSS are not "resent", there
> is an actor started which creates and sends them automatically.
>
> I had an idea in the past to specify a tag to apply on all messages
> created from a feed in order to be able to filter it. Later there was
> also the idea to be able to specify a pool, too. Maybe that's what you
> meant, and it's a great idea.
>