Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87269 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 11:06:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 11:06:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 47874 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 11:06:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47844 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 11:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47834 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 11:06:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:06:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mrinal.wadhwa@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.41] (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:06:56 +0000 Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so5109089pwj.20 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:06:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=AdBZtttOz09mzQR9o451WDc9/NIgUUkJfFLOZ3Xm0h0=; b=jomJi0JaOKrPVxqnxT83MhqD3PvErNHlTMnukUE1mtiTqo1M7hKZF3RevdXPWEBGBb mpHWhDblms3Fa1kVUgzpdNzM3yyPDAYqd7/mJNA7hq3y6G7NAGEHpX1ZQZssTx1ZDxss I9f87MZVCHnYqRS/WqsFypk9Zm/BPvH0+5Hrw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=TcOPVjG0Bjh3/wSR7r4CtaUTrsv94vgJpZiw+qEFKPgaYNgKe/Cz6QVtbyoXBZNcuF I7gBXpy2Usn2ZvjhhvAnseiwMcBBGdEEwAoqX7kmKuoXGMzeAZ05t9oEus5EtCJh5X/1 c9+nduXAOhnJsMqSgv0Cqy+mggDmKpOfhfktE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.9.31 with SMTP id 31mr957420wfi.96.1258455996105; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:06:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <771905290911170140i24059109t2fa3588e4de9f9d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <771905290911170057s5a1e926cw4b203ab471be4e29@mail.gmail.com> <771905290911170128idd04d07rd47514d5869e8681@mail.gmail.com> <771905290911170140i24059109t2fa3588e4de9f9d3@mail.gmail.com> From: Mrinal Wadhwa Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:36:16 +0530 Message-ID: <48d391a20911170306j33063441y9e5898eab95bb32f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Users on http://esmecloudperf.esme.staxapps.net/ created To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e230e9d05ac04788f1e87 --0016368e230e9d05ac04788f1e87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hey Markus, Very cool ! Thank you for setting it up. Cheers, Mrinal On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Markus Kohler wrote: > Oh and I forgot to mention. > I would like to checkin the test, but I still have to clarify whether my > company allows me to do so. > > Regards, > Markus > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Markus Kohler >wrote: > > > Hi all, > > The test is a Selenium RC test using the Java API to remotely control a > > real Firefox browser. > > Therefore it's currently single threaded. I hope that the same test will > > also run using htmlunit not using a real browser but a Java emulated one. > > With htmlunit it should also be possible to run it parallel, keep your > > fingers crossed. For the parallel test I would like to concentrate on > > posting messages first. Posting messages using Firefox already works. > > It would be really easily to create a test that covers the most important > > functionality. > > > > Sorry no screenshots yet. > > > > I've stopped the response time within the script, see attachment (times > in > > milliseconds). The times are for all steps including logout. > > Make a graph out of it and you will see it looks a bit strange. This > might > > be caused by me opening another browser on the esme performance server. > > > > > > Regards, > > Markus > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Richard Hirsch >wrote: > > > >> Awesome. > >> > >> Could you describe the test in more detail? Was the creation of users > >> sequential or did you have parallel threads working? > >> > >> Do you have access to stax console? Did you take a few screen shots? > >> > >> D. > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Markus Kohler > > >> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > The Selenium test script ran through and now we have more than 300 > Users > >> on > >> > http://esmecloudperf.esme.staxapps.net/. > >> > I took the users from my twitter account, so you might be already > there > >> ;) > >> > I say "might" because the python script I used to create a CSV file > >> with > >> > the user information doesn't seem to work 100%. > >> > > >> > It seems to me that we will already find some bugs > >> > > >> > - the Stax console shows that at a certain point the numbers of > >> threads > >> > went up > >> > - I logged in with an existing user during the test and it seems its > >> > timeline was not update > >> > - It seems that if an avatar image is not loaded the whole page > >> "hangs" > >> > (no updates) > >> > > >> > > >> > I would like encourage you to go there and test a few things manually. > >> > > >> > If you need the passwords for the users let me know. > >> > > >> > Greetings, > >> > Markus > >> > > >> > > > > > --0016368e230e9d05ac04788f1e87--