incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Hudson
Date Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:50:08 GMT
I'd like to get Hudson in place now. As the number of committers
increases (which I sure will happen :->), a CI environment will be
critical to maintain code quality and to improve our
development-related processes.

D.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree. Starting continuous integration for ESME is a great idea and
> would greatly facilitate testing. Of course, having automated tests
> makes it much more useful and our current test coverage is pretty bad,
> which is a problem I'm contributing to...
>
> Ethan
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, David Pollak
> <feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I've been exploring the Hudson site for Apache
>>> (http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/) and am pretty impressed.
>>>
>>> I've seen that lift also uses Hudson (
>>> http://hudson.scala-tools.org/job/Lift/)
>>>
>>> I'm considering adding ESME to the Apache Hudson.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any problems with this?
>>>
>>
>> Great idea.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Is there any committer who has Hudson experience to assist me setting
>>> up the project on Hudson
>>>
>>
>> I have very limited exposure to Hudson, but setting up a project is pretty
>> much pointing at the source repository and say "build when this thing
>> changes."
>>
>>
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>> Surf the harmonics
>>
>

Mime
View raw message