incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Böhringer <martin.boehrin...@wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de>
Subject AW: Collaboration with #ubimic
Date Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:41:23 GMT
I pointed Marcelo from akibot to our conversation. He is very interested and
will come back to us.
Martin

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Richard Hirsch [mailto:hirsch.dick@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 08:30
> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Collaboration with #ubimic
> 
> I was looking at the akibot offering last night and it does look
> interesting. Depending on the current akibot architecture, it might be
> relatively easy to create an ESME bot based on their existing
> technology.  They could market their engine as a standalone component
> and offer it to customers who want to track twitter or other
> microblogging systems such as ESME.  The bot could analyze the
> messages and either create new messages or integrate with back-end
> applications.  It would be a loosely-coupled integration.
> 
> We talked about having tightly-integrated plugins a while back but
> never looked at it in more detail.
> 
> We should keep akibot in mind and as things develop maybe you connect
> us up to see how we might collaborate.
> 
> D.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Martin Böhringer
> <martin.boehringer@wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> > Hi Dick,
> >
> > the current status on our student research is as following: I have a
> student
> > who works on the LEGO thing, the hardware is all built up and the
> software
> > part of the project starts tomorrow with a kickoff. Another student
> is
> > working in his bachelor thesis on the "text analysis in information
> streams"
> > topic. A bachelor thesis is not that big but I hope at least that we
> get
> > some insights in what is possible and what not. He also should look
> at
> > public available APIs (like opencalais and similar) and test them
> with
> > microblogging-like texts.
> >
> > I know from the akibot guys (akibot.com) that they want to go in a
> similar
> > direction like us (supporting a ubiquitous microblogging scenario
> with their
> > artificial intelligence microblogging bot). So this might be a good
> future
> > collaboration opportunity, too.
> >
> > What I would do next is looking for a student who wants to work
> intensively
> > on the SAP/ESME scenario. Give me a view weeks for that.
> >
> > Vassil has a good point here with the business value. We are all
> working in
> > microblogging and therefore say "hey, tweeting SAP systems are really
> cool".
> > However, "normal" people might not have this enthusiasm. Until we
> have real
> > demo systems running little mockups (GUI prototypes) might do it. We
> have it
> > on our agenda to create a #ubimic presentation where we state out the
> > motivation and the benefits. I hope to give some answers to the
> business
> > value topic in this presentation.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Martin
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Richard Hirsch [mailto:hirsch.dick@gmail.com]
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 23:28
> >> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: Collaboration with #ubimic
> >>
> >> Hi Martin,
> >>
> >> I see that you are doing some pretty cool stuff (for example, "Text
> >> Analysis in Information Streams: Status Quo and Future Perspectives
> >> (http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/wi2/wp/en/2009/08/10/text-
> >> analysis-in-information-streams-status-quo-and-future-
> perspectives/)".
> >> What about including a text analysis aspect to the collaboration?
> >>
> >> D.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Martin,
> >> >
> >> > Like I said last week when we first found out about #ubimic, you
> seem
> >> > to think along the same lines as the ESME team. So I can't find a
> any
> >> > reason why we shouldn't cooperate.
> >> >
> >> > IMHO David has defined very well the differentiating
> characteristics
> >> > of ESME: real-time responsiveness and actions. Actions also have
> some
> >> > vague similarity to some Google Wave bots. More importantly,
> actions
> >> > are important in many integration scenarios, which is the goal of
> >> > ESME.
> >> >
> >> > What I'm eagerly awaiting is a description of some of the benefits
> of
> >> > the "aggregated data from people and things" in different
> scenarios,
> >> > but I guess that's one of the goals of the collaboration ideas,
> >> right?
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Vassil
> >> >
> >
> >
> >



Mime
View raw message