Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5090 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2009 10:35:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2009 10:35:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 62421 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2009 10:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62370 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2009 10:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62360 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2009 10:35:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:35:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:34:59 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so707687fgg.0 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w96NPooZZrdgwYE8yyGqPqH/0tFrkyGXFc9KbmNcdhc=; b=QeV8nrDWG8Bf9wHxqQxK6TPIg6T0cx7gxpI7u3iW5PUARTpHDQeEqaASJOtHVe1GnA o3BdsJZni5nbNbBcnLpb4FXhtG/kntdpG/putJQEF82IJy7KGAC/7GlZSuD4I3P5cwfN OiZ9QZBYe+cTj3MJZYk3m1RXztO6h1yBOW4Y0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l8oFLdzLKqNVfp2XuM6LGF/fd54F+Q1DRQraGg8MoeFssM3lKQk//YUXN7ROn1o3KG IjNJEJ9oZMNsrrcVQBUpg6l29biqaAp67rZWXa/OCulc4ON5BRpxmKh9c21cge0PqxFL MZ0t5kbb24HvF/MKg1vOtky5P7ZCJitrY/oQo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.149.9 with SMTP id w9mr552898mud.77.1256898879486; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:34:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:34:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Vote] UI: Message page template From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Do we want to have "reply, resend, conversation" as words or use icons? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Richard Hirsch wr= ote: > I like 4/6 (I can't tell the difference) better than 5, because they > put more emphasis on message creation. > > D. > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Next UI vote, this time for the message page template. >> >> Nr. 4: http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/4.html >> Nr. 5: http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/5.html >> Nr. 6: http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/6.html >> >> Nr. 4 and 6 look very similar, the only difference is the grey backgroun= d >> behind the messages. >> >> /Anne >> >