Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19379 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2009 18:27:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2009 18:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 82941 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2009 18:27:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82892 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2009 18:27:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82882 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2009 18:27:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:27:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vdichev@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:27:48 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so426630ewy.12 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:27:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=If/Cw0Los/c13XnUAnQRUdo6v9++dazxP49kMXRNzKc=; b=dAKy6FcP4MsUdNZ7n/fgcEX8nf66aNq4bNR4TrSSafz0bkSp237MK8ocNSnOEgGdbt n9ZK9VGBtQz8X1iBicBrxNoLAuX9MerJZ1vnOp9XfBG9JWaCMXFKJ8c/3wSI9rCvPpmi zSgBqgeR7Lhsby9Ywm0vZ6uQMHyAwqtAIv2Yw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MWzLMmtjZUlrmRsiXAotQKUh3oLGXB5xRBBa6iXNkGfwZ5DomB38+aI4hLGR6dxr3J jCRa2Y0Jxfojms0rEE+ngR4ct7hntY2SZJOtW9IVF1QO76v2ZoY5NfvP8euuKeTs0csW cfIDC+ZqUTduRlXdsVJGxrid9dCLFX32EyBtg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vdichev@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.86.193 with SMTP id w43mr1775305wee.17.1256668047908; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:27:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2bca8c350910270820y73514f69t7883005d11d6c2b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <5352D51B-2446-4FDF-A7EA-3FF8A4AE3DC4@gmail.com> <2EC81667-F65E-44A0-98E0-C9B5661B5CB9@gmail.com> <68f4a0e80910270639r2642464bu897af62e375d11c5@mail.gmail.com> <2bca8c350910270820y73514f69t7883005d11d6c2b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:27:27 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b9213c7ecb87a729 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UI design From: Vassil Dichev To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I like #2 a bit better. Seems the opinion is split.