Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43113 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 14:55:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 14:55:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 62396 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 14:55:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62353 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 14:55:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62342 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 14:55:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mrinal.wadhwa@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.194] (HELO mail-pz0-f194.google.com) (209.85.222.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:55:32 +0000 Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so611884pzk.21 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:55:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lZ3t6w28ohA8efTFJre5PubsEda6h3vXnllLI6a85X8=; b=BN0enAbpndprLJHtR9/UE6+hY4C4xHZhrqyRHuBa4kIVir11a7/KrHLyBDvU4SPEOe 6q1GX/4yS50hGCQsX290Vhgdar8HvEmgvxP68lXDzosei0FhTpw2sz5fqbe8cb30fpUL 3/0rdO30XGOMKgZZLW/kf1OqSc0QAypwynVqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cfY0fCcmI3fx3icmTWdgDVPbiSFWCYOWlQmwvRrEdKhe0fb/cPICeot0P2XNqeBoPs nQLp/rK1JYs28TzdCZdRyOW2Yumkmm8+9CNsPNo6ywneUALCjEU4GIj2WzYtHjqBOKWu YqrbQpskKYhrVZb7kWctcwlGWjJaOYZ22XeMU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.3.35 with SMTP id 35mr1394514wfc.84.1256741710106; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:55:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80A8FCBB-4AC9-4D2B-9BEF-CC580A0B0EA8@gmail.com> References: <5352D51B-2446-4FDF-A7EA-3FF8A4AE3DC4@gmail.com> <2EC81667-F65E-44A0-98E0-C9B5661B5CB9@gmail.com> <68f4a0e80910270639r2642464bu897af62e375d11c5@mail.gmail.com> <2bca8c350910270820y73514f69t7883005d11d6c2b7@mail.gmail.com> <80A8FCBB-4AC9-4D2B-9BEF-CC580A0B0EA8@gmail.com> From: Mrinal Wadhwa Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:24:50 +0530 Message-ID: <48d391a20910280754p36031d8dxc9665ec6c3e371c7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: UI design To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Anne, I like #2 better .. its more light weight. The grey/blue backgrounds in #1 make it feel a little heavy As Ethan mentioned the type is a little off ... bigger size and increased letter spacing could help. I'd suggest http://www.codestyle.org/servlets/FontStack?generic=3Dsans-seri= f&stack=3DLucida%2BSans%252CLucida%2BGrande%252CLucida&font-size=3Dlarge (see after the selection dropdowns) The font stack builder is a handy tool to try different combinations http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/BuildBetterCSSFontStacks.shtml I also liked our old logo choice better ... using alternating colored dots gave an abstract feel of people connected in a network .. which is lost if we use the same dots. _ Mrinal On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Anne Kathrine Petter=C3=B8e wrote: > So far four like #2 and three #1. > > I would actually like to see a mix of the two. > I really like the top half of #2, but like the bottom half and the sectio= n > below the sign on element of #1 better. > > These templates are also just suggestions, so please feel free to say wha= t > you like/don't like. > We haven't finalized the look and feeling yet. > I will however set a deadline for this tomorrow morning, as I would like = to > finish the design as fast as possible. > > /Anne > > On 27. okt. 2009, at 19.27, Vassil Dichev wrote: > >> I like #2 a bit better. >> >> Seems the opinion is split. > >