Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vdichev@gmail.com designates
 209.85.218.224 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=WiuV50wRNov/KfPn81w8YN12Y6otrpiN7rqQhV+80kdoILV7Au3bv+xHQvzEIi5X9M
         1REy/9514Vm4TY2mNEWMsA9CP+FWNaq2hRIT0dVdLaLtJCefZihfLInYsmWB7KXp7UDS
         MgQ0YmU2OrbeyavnKFPBihonlLRJ/GCJRGVjo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: vdichev@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <8d32b3490907151011y2fbd749cy8fe2b9cdec671512@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8d32b3490907141705g5cb3c6eh477cedb7a615aed0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <960ac33e0907150013g6d224199pf1f218dd27440e27@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8d32b3490907151011y2fbd749cy8fe2b9cdec671512@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:39:39 +0300
Message-ID: <c7fc82820907160039m73538b31jc7be7e31807b5025@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is anyone going to the BASE meeting at LinkedIn tonight?
From: Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org>
To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I went and it was pretty good, although the traffic getting there was
> horrible. Yes, I saw Michael there but didn't ask him because I didn't think
> he was part of ESME because I haven't seen his email or name on the list or
> JIRA. Its fine, is just sometimes nice to speak and ask questions face to
> face when the opportunity arises.

Surprisingly, there are places other than San Francisco where people
work with Scala ;-) The ESME team, though small, is spread around the
world.

> I only wanted to go over a couple of things. There are almost no comments in
> the source and stepping though multi threaded apps with a debugger isn't too
> easy. Picking the best spots to gather stats without peppering the whole
> codebase has been a bit challenging because there is so much recursive-like
> ( I know that is a bad description ) message passing and no comments to
> indicate how classes/methods/traits etc. should and are being used. However,
> I am coming along and have some code written. I will be uploading it soon. I
> keep getting sidetracked with work emergencies.

As soon as we have something decent to show with ESME, I'll focus on
documentation- I promise. I'm almost finished with the feature set I
personally want to see in the upcoming (hopefully soon) release.