Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81284 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 18:20:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 18:20:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 92089 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 18:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92044 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 18:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92034 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 18:20:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:20:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.220] (HELO mail-ew0-f220.google.com) (209.85.219.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:20:09 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so2377347ewy.12 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:19:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UkXNctN0IgR2L2ntPED+0QtKhMK1LfjpI8gS2ziHG6Y=; b=raYm9iKxrRnL0KOwWp3VqtnFisQQT5jF+KgeAHqjGiuhsiuKr3xvhPD0z/P7SAzpQ9 it0dn/I2Rz6QQYQh/mzrkHfLxAfZ8cATTwQ3lLeg5nvJ50CFU1Gve+fZLKMS7RCfXa7+ b0Pq5c+RVq7z/5Dclop6i77+3B5TeksXE5D98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=e4dIdtyWBQj6HxhQw3g+KcKTB3fxNi+8V7aCvL1extkACXrOG8fhK44je+8hNQObZN W/7lEXx5OfHshdfaq0NEgD7ScFT5I9hPxBr9h9DASh5lYwV59SToZzLuvheeY/jd1RPH aCsM8OlkWzb0LXvTvvEUdLiVyPffu9KaPHqWk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.47.196 with SMTP id t46mr1184936web.121.1245435588666; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:19:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:19:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VOTE: Merge Pool access code into Trunk now From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6c788da6717046cb79190 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f6c788da6717046cb79190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'd like to close this vote 1+ (3) + I'm assuming that David and Vassil also approve - although they didn't officially add "+1" in their mails. @Vassil: please merge the brach into the trunk. D. On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e wrote: > Not at all a problem. 3 days is fine. > > /Anne > > > > On 15. juni. 2009, at 16.23, Richard Hirsch wrote: > > Of course. 3 days is no problem for me. >> >> D >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Vassil Dichev >> wrote: >> >> I'd like to have until end of day on Wednesday to look at the branch. >>>> >>> Can >>> >>>> we delay the merge until Thursday? >>>> >>> >>> We haven't defined what "now" means exactly, but I think the team >>> wanted to evaluate the pools functionality rather sooner than later. >>> Reviewing the code is one of the more important aspects of evaluating >>> the new functionality though, so I don't think most people would >>> object if we put that as higher priority. >>> >>> So does everyone agree to specify "now" to mean "in 3 days"? The >>> effort would be equal for me, but under these circumstances I would >>> prefer to give David a say in the matter first- after all, he's a key >>> factor in creating the pool requirements. >>> >>> Vassil >>> >>> > --001485f6c788da6717046cb79190--