incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: User no longer contains view code
Date Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:46:06 GMT
A question that came up for me yesterday when reading these emails,  
was the token.
What did we decide on here?
Do we keep the token?

/Anne


On 14. juni. 2009, at 19.56, David Pollak wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Vassil Dichev <vdichev@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>>> User no longer contains view code.
>>
>> Thanks, that was a much needed change!
>>
>>> Next step is to make user work with plugable authentication  
>>> mechanisms.
>>
>> I noticed that by moving the code from MetaMegaSuperDuperUser you've
>> also copied some of the methods which are responsible for password
>> authentication- but commented. Can we reuse these or is it better not
>> to?
>>
>
> This stuff was from MegaProtoUser... but don't use it.
>
> I'm going to split out the authentication piece... hopefully on  
> Tuesday.
> This will allow plugable authentication with multiple mechanisms per  
> user
> (OpenId and username/pwd will ship by default).  There'll be a  
> separate
> table for this stuff... and hopefully I can make it backward  
> compatible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>>
>> Vassil
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp


Mime
View raw message