Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56031 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2009 22:32:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2009 22:32:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 45572 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2009 22:32:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45556 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2009 22:32:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45545 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2009 22:32:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:32:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yojibee@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:31:59 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so966192fga.26 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:31:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=f2bZ7YlqEwH5pk3q+yso8uVFR1QGDYDzTSSVtEdv0gg=; b=iSr/SPzLqzxvGJIwkkSs7+5u1PpXt/rkaxP42lM1yWkjrrFY35UUMBa2I7U8CT28B+ 6YUrqFN6Jzx5E9z4+nIjCfxK6AgJNX4LNVdb3GHTDUCgfshAK13A/KnXQQ0d/n97SaC1 EitotjyaHqDFLvgaSz0bQkImemeveePriNwuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=Vi65LYgUIrkChwhLvXaGABS3wWRGKQyMI9JGlrR+weM8qpUYZs1RgLYNZImw0VrpXv wcs06a08jxRbNep5KC9a8StPxNSjL9LFXfxik/L3O+2I8Wxa8VcwHRxE9zQTDy7k/h7h uvTEvfiwvpZP2Vz8fUKqmLG3OK/yMBBMZhw4k= Received: by 10.103.174.16 with SMTP id b16mr1170206mup.28.1234132298173; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:31:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.195? (062016175178.customer.alfanett.no [62.16.175.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b9sm595204mug.32.2009.02.08.14.31.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:31:37 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <46F5D666-C13F-43E5-86D3-274200223BC7@gmail.com> From: Anne Kathrine Petteroe To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Sprint 1 Results Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:31:36 +0100 References: <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E16607ADE158@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I really like the sprint email idea. Monday, Wednesday, Friday sounds good. We still have calls Tuesdays and Thursdays for those who would like to join. I haven't had as much time as I though I would have for ESME. I also had a feeling it was too much on the list, I didn't quite know where to start, so I ended up not really starting at all. The time I had available I had to use preparing for a very important presentation this week Thursday which might lead to an investment. /Anne On 8. feb.. 2009, at 22.21, Vassil Dichev wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It's difficult enough to estimate the time a task would take, but in > ESME's case many of us don't even know how much time they will have > available beforehand. I expect that eventually I'll get better at this > as I learn what ESME needs and how difficult it would be. There's > still a lot for me to learn from Lift and even Scala in order to reach > optimum productivity. I'm also making progress in finding regular > chunks of time for ESME without it interfering with the rest of my > duties. > > I feel we should have 2 goals- a conservative goal and an optimistic > goal. The first one will be what we definitely think we should be able > to accomplish, the second one is for extra tasks. > > The important next step after finding the reasons for underachievement > is finding what we can improve. For me there were a couple of personal > issues out of my control, which put my plans off balance the last > couple of weeks. > > Vassil