incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
Subject Re: RESTful ESME API - Design
Date Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:18:19 GMT
Hi David,

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:39 PM, David Pollak
<feeder.of.the.bears@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org
>> wrote:
>>... Do I understand correctly that the need for HTTP sessions comes from
>> the mechanisms used by the Lift/Scala backend to implement long
>> polling? Just trying to understand the issues.
>
>
> Sessions set up listeners.  Listeners are stateful.  Stateful means sessions
> so that even if after the HTTP request is serviced, the listener can receive
> updates and respond with those updates immediately upon the next HTTP
> request for new messages.  The requirement is neither a Lift nor a Scala
> requirement, but an ESME design requirement....

Thanks for the explanation, totally agree with those requirements.

But note that, although I'm not a messaging systems specialist, this
does not IMHO *require* using HTTP sessions - you could achieve the
same in a RESTful way, considering your listening session as a
resource, expressing the statefulness of things more clearly in URLs.

I jumped into this thread because at some point I might like to
implement the ESME (or another micro-messaging) API using
Sling/Jackrabbit server-side, and we don't like HTTP sessions much
there. But if they fit well into the ESME model, so be it.

> ...So, I've got the Lift 1.0 launch today, a book on Scala to finish, a week
> full of meeting next week, QCon London the following week and TSS the week
> after that, so I'm not going to have a lot of time to go through another
> round of "REST is the only way to go" debates....

Good on you. We're all busy people, and in many ways that's a good thing.

-Bertrand

Mime
View raw message