Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 92388 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2009 09:24:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2009 09:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2041 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2009 09:24:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2011 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2009 09:24:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1993 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2009 09:24:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dakoller@googlemail.com designates 209.85.218.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.15] (HELO mail-bw0-f15.google.com) (209.85.218.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:24:42 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so19382413bwz.12 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=m00CwvVX7EMmHxxq1JCh9Aq6Oir4CWRKzhNJrk87l5k=; b=D+g65kzpLJWuEUtQ5AkhzQWpi9SLPyFCWOwBnpxlGaAc6ONKxHN/KU1ztLvaoV4wu9 kZTU6hX7U7dag7S4WUaqIGqfyKGzYJxoZ///L2SmHReypT50SP8q+nI8wOFYOYZfdLdR xd5jjjmS/T72gruZU0rVGFQLF35+YeLu173yE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=HrKqfKAgiYhZd2o+E7FlkNglezigefVNf+l+NUwMPYR7FEZFfpZv4nnthLqrONwd7f tALhi/xI+nTXRQ+HwAJiJJ7nDiy1Llvn7KKF4DOq6hpPJgIv1G306Chw3RdvddUwm2EF scF7jDdYjY6GeUUNUFA92b5tshaqioyFs7oRw= Received: by 10.223.108.140 with SMTP id f12mr12069782fap.23.1231320259677; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:24:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.106.210 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:24:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2bca8c350901070124i669d5120w7aa64475f9b60e95@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:24:19 +0100 From: "Daniel Koller" To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Web UI options In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30548_14900437.1231320259671" References: <9AA5AADC-0B71-4306-BCE4-D981549D3F74@gmail.com> <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F3F@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net> <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F40@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net> <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F41@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net> <48d391a20901070047i2a01be70o3afcfc4a443fe79e@mail.gmail.com> <30DB6ACF50A0A3439F39EFEB1C52E166049C6F42@nets13ja.ww300.siemens.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_30548_14900437.1231320259671 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? +1 Daniel On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Anne Kathrine Petteroe wrote: > Do we have the UI Mrinal created last autumn hosted somewhere? > And if not, could we? > I really need a better looking UI than the one which is up on esme.us now > for demo purposes in the next coming weeks. > > - Anne > > > On 7. jan.. 2009, at 09.49, Hirsch, Richard wrote: > > I agree. >> >> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Mrinal Wadhwa [mailto:mrinal.wadhwa@gmail.com] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. J=E4nner 2009 09:47 >> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Web UI options >> >> +1 Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? >> >> I don't think an intermediate UI would be worth the effort >> >> Mrinal >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Hirsch, Richard >> wrote: >> >> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> D. >>> >>> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Hirsch, Richard >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. J=E4nner 2009 09:18 >>> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Betreff: [VOTE] Web UI options >>> >>> Last night on the scrum call, we were discussing various options for th= e >>> Web UI and I wanted to summarize what we were discussing and ask the >>> community on what option we should follow. >>> >>> -Situation- >>> >>> We currently have a Web UI running at the main ESME server at >>> http://esme.us. This version is very early iteration and has various >>> issues associated with it. It is also based on the old core code based >>> at the Google Code site. We now have a new new ESME core code base >>> which is located at Apache. This version of the code at Apache is the >>> most recent code base and includes a better split between UI and server >>> code. The Apache version, however, currently doesn't have UI code in >>> such maturity that we could use it to replace the existing Web site at >>> esme.us. Bill has also created a description of a new ESME UI which >>> probably depicts what the next UI is going to look like. This >>> description is currently incomplete inasmuch as certain UI features are >>> still not depicted. >>> >>> -Vote- >>> >>> The vote deals with the decision whether we want to build an >>> intermediary Web-UI based on the existing Apache Core or whether we wan= t >>> to skip the intermediary Web UI and focus on the "BillF" UI? >>> >>> Choices (Please Vote!): >>> >>> * Create an intermediary UI >>> >>> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? >>> >>> Once the community makes a decision on this issue, we will define the >>> associated tasks to support the decision. >>> >>> Dick >>> >>> >>> >>> > --=20 --- Daniel Koller Jahnstrasse 20 80469 M=FCnchen * dakoller@googlemail.com ------=_Part_30548_14900437.1231320259671--