incubator-esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petteroe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AW: [VOTE] Web UI options
Date Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:17:53 GMT
Hi Darren,

sure thing! (hands already itching)
I finally managed to scan my iCLA yesterday, so I will send it today.
But submitting the iCLA won't make me a commiter I think? There needs  
to be a vote I think?

- Anne


On 7. jan.. 2009, at 11.41, Darren Hague wrote:

> Anne / Mrinal,
>
> Can you then start with some work on the existing HTML/CSS files in  
> the Apache SVN repo to make it look more like Mrinal's UI?  I  
> recommend changing little & often, so that we stay reasonably in  
> sync - it will probably just be the three of us updating those HTML  
> files for the next few weeks.
>
> Of course, this means we are producing an intermediary UI after all  
> - just one that is based on Mrinal's code... :-)
>
> Anne - have you submitted an iCLA yet?  We will need to have you  
> enabled as a committer. Until then, it's probably best for you to  
> send patches to Mrinal.
>
> Cheers,
> Darren
>
>> That would be awesome!
>>
>> I am all for
>> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?.
>> It makes no sense to me to make an intermediary UI if we can use
>> Mrinal's UI to bridge the gap.
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On 7. jan.. 2009, at 11.17, Hirsch, Richard wrote:
>>
>>> We could have a Stax-based version up and running quickly. I just
>>> need the war file from Mrinal.
>>>
>>> People who view this version must be made aware that this UI
>>> probably won't be available after the BillF UI comes.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Anne Kathrine Petteroe [mailto:yojibee@gmail.com]
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Jänner 2009 10:59
>>> An: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Web UI options
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7. jan.. 2009, at 10.32, Vassil Dichev wrote:
>>>
>>>> Generally I shouldn't be trusted about UI decisions, but it doesn't
>>>> seem that working on something that will be discarded shortly will
>>>> pay
>>>> off. Any pros for using intermediary UI?
>>>
>>> Pros would be that I need a better looking UI for demo purposes.
>>> First of all I have had an interview lined up for 5 weeks already,
>>> which I have had to cancel twice because of problems with the COIL
>>> server.
>>> Now that the COIL server is no longer there, I don't have an  
>>> instance
>>> where I can show off ESME with a better looking UI.
>>> Not sure for how much longer I can postpone it.
>>>
>>> Secondly, my company is very interested in investing in ESME this
>>> year, but they don't want to take a second look at it until we  
>>> have a
>>> more contemporary UI than the current one. I feel it would be a pity
>>> to throw away a possibility for an investement only because we  
>>> didn't
>>> have a UI.
>>> We don't have any competitors here, so if we really want to, we can
>>> make it happen.
>>>
>>> - Anne
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
>>>> +1
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> darren.hague@fortybeans.com


Mime
View raw message