Mailing-List: contact empire-db-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: empire-db-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: re: getTitle() or getName()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:48:02 +0100
Message-ID: <B297D4737108A0459B66C3A85BB7F90127CB54@kn.esteam.de>
In-Reply-To: <4D11D17F.1060802@embl.de>
Thread-Topic: re: getTitle() or getName()
Thread-Index: AcuhwkaFDaX8QDBvT2G9SKIg3PwvRAAGTKCA
References: <4D11D17F.1060802@embl.de>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rainer_D=F6bele?= <doebele@esteam.de>
To: <empire-db-user@incubator.apache.org>

Hi Alain,

thanks for your commendation of our little project.
We are certainly significantly different from other database access =
solutions and it's good to see that other people share our enthusiasm =
for this approach.

About the getTitle() in DBRowSet.updateRecord:
This is indeed a (minor) bug - thanks for reporting it.
The getName() function delivers the physical name whereas getTitle() is =
an optional attribute that may be set to supply a logical name.

I will fix this bug immediately.

Best regards
Rainer


Alain Becam wrote:
> from: Alain Becam [mailto:Alain.Becam@embl.de]
> to: empire-db-user@incubator.apache.org
> re: getTitle() or getName()
>=20
> Hello,
>      I have just discovered EmpireDB some weeks ago, and start to use =
it
> for our next implementation. Thank you for this nice work, I am very
> impressed by such a good KISS approach (especially of course the pure
> POJO, no String-literal approach, which is extremely handy for
> "SQL-centric" applications).
>=20
> Then I am migrating some of our table, and it appeared that a field =
was
> null for a required columns (the primary key ;) ). And I got the
> message: "The value for field null must not be null."
>=20
> If I actually replace the getTitle() in DBRowSet.updateRecord by
> getName() I get the column name:
>=20
>                       else if (primaryKey!=3Dnull &&
> primaryKey.contains(col))
>                       {   // All primary key fields must be supplied
> -                        return error(DBErrors.FieldNotNull,
> col.getTitle());
> +                        return error(DBErrors.FieldNotNull,
> "(updateRecord: part of primary key) " + col.getName());
>                       }
>                       else if (col.isRequired())
>                       {   // Error Column is required!
> -                        return error(DBErrors.FieldNotNull,
> col.getTitle());
> +                        return error(DBErrors.FieldNotNull,
> "(updateRecord: required) " + col.getName());
>                       }
>=20
> I wonder if there is something I am missing here.
>=20
> Cheers,
>    Alain