Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-empire-db-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49108 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 22:44:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 22:44:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26588 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 22:44:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-empire-db-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26560 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 22:44:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact empire-db-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26550 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2009 22:44:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:44:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of martijn.dashorst@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:44:13 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so2642155bwz.12 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:43:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fiKu0Hct7GyNfHjduRs6+YN6ZFrxymByNiOS6Q88b30=; b=M9RcSXYx8mM3ykoYm6xqtb+QD/25sXlUicHEtuSdw9M2dPSPInlGQuOlZm6bhFQ3UN 88fADl2o6G+PS7F1DsWf+5LGHz2Y17O2IGblwSavtuojc3pJdMNUuN8Df2KGaeMJCZ20 W+YkxFGw8GO9HgN55JWUxK8GHKR36nzVT8+ls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YhKl6Bry05N++FcUemr7/hrMVXruw19j4mHAThiezlzfxOmW9QtG/aKio5QpbRK4jY wKoAoyGnjKaAfXJyQWcdW8a8q4j3rCiK+zAPsovSGFL0wqzksWmOO6spy6sGJXRVgePS KmYzzbaZ4GdoMmKgtjTLk3mwcMQrZfjfhNK3k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.182.3 with SMTP id j3mr3870770mup.54.1249339432843; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:43:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <918312fe0908031541u15783bb9lb5d3ebba78ea41a@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ab983230907260815i7bfe722do57c06927c55d7e9c@mail.gmail.com> <3ab983230908031459n4cb88bb0h9b9cde4ad8fb2126@mail.gmail.com> <918312fe0908031541u15783bb9lb5d3ebba78ea41a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:43:52 +0200 Message-ID: <918312fe0908031543yed042b7id46899cfdeeb25d2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: re [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating From: Martijn Dashorst To: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One of the major benefits of graduating is that you don't have to wait for your mentors (and Incubator PMC members) to vote +1 on a release :) Martijn On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Francis De > Brabandere wrote: >> =A0+1 votes: 3 (+1 non-binding) > > Not quite true unfortunately... You have 0 binding votes (according to > Apache rules). The only votes that are binding are those of a PMC > overseeing a top level project [1], which is the Incubator PMC for > Empire-db. As none of your Mentors have voted (who are the only > Incubator PMC members in your project), you have 0 (legally) binding > votes. > > PPMC votes *DO* count, though: there's little precedent in people > voting -1 after the PPMC members have voted +1 to add a committer, for > example. Releases are trickier, because there's much more that can go > wrong from a legal standpoint. So in release votes, you're likely to > see more -1 votes from Incubator PMC members than with adding a > Committer. > > Now how to proceed with this release: > =A0- prod your Mentors to review the release (Henning, Thomas and myself)= , > =A0- ask the Incubator PMC on general@ to review the release and approve > it (send the same message from dev@ to general@) > =A0- answer any questions that might arise from PMC members > =A0- if you don't have 3 binding +1 votes after 72 hours, prod the > general@ list again=97remember it is vacation time > =A0- prod your mentors again and ask *them* to ask for reviewers > when you have at least 3 binding +1 votes, and no -1 votes, then > you're ready to release the files. > > The reason why there's this distinction is because Apache is a > corporation where committees represent the corporation and need to > officially show awareness of decisions that are binding to the > Foundation. The board installs these committees by resolution to > provide oversight. The only folks that are able to provide oversight > are those that have been appointed by the board. Since the PPMC is not > installed by the board, but a artifact from the Incubator, PPMC votes > are not legally binding. Adding a committer is a legally binding > action. Adding a PMC member is a legally binding action. Changing the > Chair of the PMC is a legally binding action, and finally releasing > software is legally binding. This provides The ASF with the means to > protect individuals against litigation: the corporation is > accountable, not the individual developer. Without the binding votes, > The ASF won't be able to protect us individuals (adequately) from > litigation. > > Martijn > > [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > --=20 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0