Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-empire-db-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81835 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2009 22:05:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2009 22:05:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 95192 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 22:06:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-empire-db-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95164 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 22:06:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact empire-db-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95131 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2009 22:06:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:06:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.7.226.111] (HELO mail.esteam.de) (217.7.226.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:06:47 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: re: Distribution MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:06:23 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3ab983230907261446l7274f62fne1ad21afcc097a9a@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: re: Distribution Thread-Index: AcoOOqhQfmOwY76gTjGM8xLvaqlRvgAASBdg References: <3ab983230907261150k5c7357dfw66aa2f53f780f42@mail.gmail.com> <3ab983230907261301o7a438802ud0301b68c472ca09@mail.gmail.com> <3ab983230907261446l7274f62fne1ad21afcc097a9a@mail.gmail.com> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rainer_D=F6bele?= To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Francis, I am someone who downloads distributions. When I discover a new project = I want to find out what it does. For that I need the examples and the = documentation. For me it would really convenient to have the javadoc = available right away. Hence IMO the distribution file is mainly for people who evaluate = Empire-db as an option amongst others. And we just want to make sure = that we win the competition. Sure it's not a blocker but we really should consider it for this = release since the next one is still far away. And it's probably not a big deal is it? Let's see what the others say and whether more issues are coming up. Regards, Rainer Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Re: Distribution >=20 > already fixed that inceptionyear in trunk, is 2008 ok? >=20 > we can always link to the javadoc/src/jar from the site (link to maven > central repo) >=20 > I think we need to think about who will download the distribution and > what they will expect but maybe we can tackle this in a next release? > Most people using maven will never download the distribution. They > will just add the artifacts in their pom or check out svn. >=20 > > [INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null > I suppose this is not a problem, maybe null is the default workspace? >=20 > Cheers, > Francis >=20 > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Rainer D=F6bele > wrote: > > Hi Francis, > > > > Yes, the previous distribution (empire-db-2.0.4) contained the > javadoc in the docs subdirectory. > > Personally I think it's not a must, but it won't hurt to provide it > either. > > > > When I build the sources using "mvn clean install eclipse:eclipse" > it's always coming up with an info saying "inceptionYear not = specified, > defaulting to 2009". Is this anything that's worth fixing? > > And I also get the message: "[INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null" > which I don't know what it means. > > I guess this has been around for a while but I have just failed to > notice so far. > > So if this is OK there is no reason to bother. > > > > Regards > > Rainer > > > > > > Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> Re: Distribution > >> > >> did we have javadoc in the distribution before? > >> > >> I think the distribution is ok > >> > >> In fact the distribution is only for people not using maven, they > have > >> sources and jar's. I don't think they'll be needing anything else? > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rainer D=F6bele > >> wrote: > >> > Thanks Francis, > >> > > >> > this is our first Maven based release so I nobody (probably) > expects > >> everything to work at the first attempt. > >> > > >> > If there is anything I can do please let me know. > >> > > >> > Patiently waiting... > >> > Rainer > >> > > >> > Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> >> re: Distribution > >> >> > >> >> Dist build needs to be redone. Will take care of that. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.somatik.be > >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.