incubator-empire-db-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francis De Brabandere <franci...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Distribution
Date Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:18:21 GMT
Night.

I got the javadoc in the dist now...
I need to make some documentation on the release process!

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de> wrote:
> Yep. I am off to bed now. Until tomorrow.
>
> Rainer
>
> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> Re: Distribution
>>
>> on second thought, sources are handy for the examples
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Francis De
>> Brabandere<francisdb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > already fixed that inceptionyear in trunk, is 2008 ok?
>> >
>> > we can always link to the javadoc/src/jar from the site (link to
>> maven
>> > central repo)
>> >
>> > I think we need to think about who will download the distribution and
>> > what they will expect but maybe we can tackle this in a next release?
>> > Most people using maven will never download the distribution. They
>> > will just add the artifacts in their pom or check out svn.
>> >
>> >> [INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null
>> > I suppose this is not a problem, maybe null is the default workspace?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Francis
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi Francis,
>> >>
>> >> Yes, the previous distribution (empire-db-2.0.4) contained the
>> javadoc in the docs subdirectory.
>> >> Personally I think it's not a must, but it won't hurt to provide it
>> either.
>> >>
>> >> When I build the sources using "mvn clean install eclipse:eclipse"
>> it's always coming up with an info saying "inceptionYear not specified,
>> defaulting to 2009". Is this anything that's worth fixing?
>> >> And I also get the message: "[INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null"
>> which I don't know what it means.
>> >> I guess this has been around for a while but I have just failed to
>> notice so far.
>> >> So if this is OK there is no reason to bother.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Rainer
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> >>> Re: Distribution
>> >>>
>> >>> did we have javadoc in the distribution before?
>> >>>
>> >>> I think the distribution is ok
>> >>>
>> >>> In fact the distribution is only for people not using maven, they
>> have
>> >>> sources and jar's. I don't think they'll be needing anything else?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Thanks Francis,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > this is our first Maven based release so I nobody (probably)
>> expects
>> >>> everything to work at the first attempt.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > If there is anything I can do please let me know.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Patiently waiting...
>> >>> > Rainer
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> >>> >> re: Distribution
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Dist build needs to be redone. Will take care of that.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> http://www.somatik.be
>> >>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.somatik.be
>> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.somatik.be
>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>



-- 
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

Mime
View raw message